Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27374336›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2016

Changing Balance of Spinal Cord Excitability and Nociceptive Brain Activity in Early Human Development.

Caroline Hartley, Fiona Moultrie, Deniz Gursul, Amy Hoskin, Eleri Adams, Richard Rogers, Rebeccah Slater

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sensory event-related potential morphology predicts age in premature infants.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Nociception and the neonatal brain.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline HartleyDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Fiona MoultrieDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Deniz GursulDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Amy HoskinDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Eleri AdamsDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Richard RogersNuffield Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Rebeccah SlaterDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK. Electronic address: rebeccah.slater@paediatrics.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In adults, nociceptive reflexes and behavioral responses are modulated by a network of brain regions via descending projections to the spinal dorsal horn [1]. Coordinated responses to noxious inputs manifest from a balance of descending facilitation and inhibition. In contrast, young infants display exaggerated and uncoordinated limb reflexes [2]. Our understanding of nociceptive processing in the infant brain has been advanced by the use of electrophysiological and hemodynamic imaging [3-6]. From approximately 35 weeks' gestation, nociceptive-specific patterns of brain activity emerge [7], whereas prior to this, non-specific bursts of activity occur in response to noxious, tactile, visual, and auditory stimulation [7-10]. During the preterm period, refinement of spinal cord excitability is also observed: reflex duration shortens, response threshold increases, and improved discrimination between tactile and noxious events occurs [2, 11, 12]. However, the development of descending modulation in human infants remains relatively unexplored. In 40 infants aged 28-42 weeks' gestation, we examined the relationship between nociceptive brain activity and spinal reflex withdrawal activity in response to a clinically essential noxious procedure. Nociceptive-specific brain activity increases in magnitude with gestational age, whereas reflex withdrawal activity decreases in magnitude, duration, and latency across the same developmental period. By recording brain and spinal cord activity in the same infants, we demonstrate that the maturation of nociceptive brain activity is concomitant with the refinement of noxious-evoked limb reflexes. We postulate that, consistent with studies in animals, infant reflexes are influenced by the development of top-down inhibitory modulation from maturing subcortical and cortical brain networks.

Indexed as

NociceptionBrainFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMaleSpinal Cord

Identifiers

PMID27374336
PMCPMC4985558
OpenAlexW2460191948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.