Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27374240›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Human neural stem cell-induced endothelial morphogenesis requires autocrine/paracrine and juxtacrine signaling.

Chung-Hsing Chou, Michel Modo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Modeling cerebral developmentbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Physical therapy exerts sub-additive and suppressive effects on intracerebral neural stem cell implantation in a rat model of stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Article
  6. Understanding neural stem cell regulationRegenerative medicine · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Dynamic secretome of bone marrow-derived stromal cells reveals a cardioprotective biochemical cocktail.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bioscaffold-Induced Brain Tissue Regeneration.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chung-Hsing ChouUniversity of Pittsburgh, Department of Radiology, Department of Bioengineering, McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA.
Michel ModoUniversity of Pittsburgh, Department of Radiology, Department of Bioengineering, McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA.

Funding

Non-invasive Imaging of the In Situ Restoration of Brain TissueR01NS082226 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MODO, MICHEL M. · 2014 to 2016
$921k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS082226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transplanted neural stem cells (NSC) interact with the host brain microenvironment. A neovascularization is commonly observed in the vicinity of the cell deposit, which is correlated with behavioral improvements. To elucidate the signaling mechanisms between human NSCs and endothelial cells (ECs), these were cocultured in an in vitro model in which NSC-induced endothelial morphogenesis produced a neurovascular environment. Soluble (autocrine/paracrine) and contact-mediated (juxtacrine) signaling molecules were evaluated for two conditionally immortalized fetal NSC lines derived from the cortical anlage (CTXOE03) and ganglionic eminence (STROC05), as well as an adult EC line (D3) derived from the cerebral microvasculature of a hippocampal biopsy. STROC05 were 4 times as efficient to induce endothelial morphogenesis compared to CTXOE03. The cascade of reciprocal interactions between NSCs and ECs in this process was determined by quantifying soluble factors, receptor mapping, and immunocytochemistry for extracellular matrix molecules. The mechanistic significance of these was further evaluated by pharmacological blockade. The sequential cell-specific regulation of autocrine/paracrine and juxtacrine signaling accounted for the differential efficiency of NSCs to induce endothelial morphogenesis. These in vitro studies shed new light on the reciprocal interactions between NSCs and ECs, which are pivotal for our mechanistic understanding of the efficacy of NSC transplantation.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationAutocrine CommunicationBrainCell DifferentiationCell LineCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesEndothelial CellsEndothelium, VascularHumansMicrovesselsMorphogenesisNeural Stem CellsParacrine CommunicationSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID27374240
PMCPMC4931512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.