ArticleCritical care (London, England)2016
Current real-life use of vasopressors and inotropes in cardiogenic shock - adrenaline use is associated with excess organ injury and mortality.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 201 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies.Intensive care medicine · 2024Pooled it
- The association of vasoactive-inotropic score and surgical patients' outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Epinephrine and short-term survival in cardiogenic shock: an individual data meta-analysis of 2583 patients.Intensive care medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Levosimendan for patients with severely reduced left ventricular systolic function and/or low cardiac output syndrome undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2017Pooled it
- Implications of Myocardial Infarction on Management and Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Trial
- Cardiogenic Shock Centers and Protocols for Acute Cardiovascular Care: Bridging the Gap Between Spoke and Hub Sites.Cardiology and therapy · 2026Review
- Stabilize, Delay, or Intervene?: Management of Postinfarction Septal Rupture With Limited Evidence.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Acute kidney injury as a prognostic determinant in cardiogenic shock: a cohort study.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Article
- Management of post-resuscitation vasoplegic shock: targets, strategies and outcomes.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Comparative Efficacy of Noradrenaline vs. Other Vasopressors on Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Hemodynamic effects of levosimendan in low cardiac output syndrome post-CABG refractory to standard inotropic therapy.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Article
- UNLOADERS-PVAD Weaning Score: predicting post-weaning adverse events in cardiogenic shock patients supported by microaxial flow pump.Journal of intensive care · 2025Article
- Inotropes and mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: more questions than answers.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025Article
- The current use of vasoactive agents in cardiogenic shock related to myocardial infarction and acute decompensated heart failure.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- Levosimendan in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Refractory to Dobutamine Weaning.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025Article
- Beta-Blockers as an Immunologic and Autonomic Manipulator in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of the Recent Literature.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Inotropic Agents: Are We Still in the Middle of Nowhere?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- EPidemiology Of Cardiogenic sHock in Scotland (EPOCHS): A multicentre, prospective observational study of the prevalence, management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock in Scotland.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2024Article
- Clinical Application of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Treatment of Fulminant Myocarditis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 7 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVasopressors and inotropes remain a cornerstone in stabilization of the severely impaired hemodynamics and cardiac output in cardiogenic shock (CS). The aim of this study was to analyze current real-life use of these medications, and their impact on outcome and on changes in cardiac and renal biomarkers over time in CS.
methodsThe multinational CardShock study prospectively enrolled 219 patients with CS. The use of vasopressors and inotropes was analyzed in relation to the primary outcome, i.e., 90-day mortality, with propensity score methods in 216 patients with follow-up data available. Changes in cardiac and renal biomarkers over time until 96 hours from baseline were analyzed with linear mixed modeling.
resultsPatients were 67 (SD 12) years old, 26 % were women, and 28 % had been resuscitated from cardiac arrest prior to inclusion. On average, systolic blood pressure was 78 (14) and mean arterial pressure 57 (11) mmHg at detection of shock. 90-day mortality was 41 %. Vasopressors and/or inotropes were administered to 94 % of patients and initiated principally within the first 24 hours. Noradrenaline and adrenaline were given to 75 % and 21 % of patients, and 30 % received several vasopressors. In multivariable logistic regression, only adrenaline (21 %) was independently associated with increased 90-day mortality (OR 5.2, 95 % CI 1.88, 14.7, p = 0.002). The result was independent of prior cardiac arrest (39 % of patients treated with adrenaline), and the association remained in propensity-score-adjusted analysis among vasopressor-treated patients (OR 3.0, 95 % CI 1.3, 7.2, p = 0.013); this was further confirmed by propensity-score-matched analysis. Adrenaline was also associated, independent of prior cardiac arrest, with marked worsening of cardiac and renal biomarkers during the first days. Dobutamine and levosimendan were the most commonly used inotropes (49 % and 24 %). There were no differences in mortality, whether noradrenaline was combined with dobutamine or levosimendan.
conclusionAmong vasopressors and inotropes, adrenaline was independently associated with 90-day mortality in CS. Moreover, adrenaline use was associated with marked worsening in cardiac and renal biomarkers. The combined use of noradrenaline with either dobutamine or levosimendan appeared prognostically similar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.