Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27374027›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2016

Current real-life use of vasopressors and inotropes in cardiogenic shock - adrenaline use is associated with excess organ injury and mortality.

Tuukka Tarvasmäki, Johan Lassus, Marjut Varpula, Alessandro Sionis, Reijo Sund, Lars Køber, Jindrich Spinar, John Parissis, Marek Banaszewski, Jose Silva Cardoso and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
24.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 201 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Inotropes and mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: more questions than answers.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Levosimendan in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Refractory to Dobutamine Weaning.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 9 countries.

Tuukka TarvasmäkiEmergency Medicine, University of Helsinki and Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 340, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland. tuukka.tarvasmaki@fimnet.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3406-243X
Johan LassusDivision of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Marjut VarpulaDivision of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Alessandro SionisIntensive Cardiac Care Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
Reijo SundDepartment of Social Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Research Methods, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Lars KøberRigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Division of Heart Failure, Pulmonary Hypertension and Heart Transplantation, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jindrich SpinarDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
John ParissisHeart Failure Clinic and Secondary Cardiology Department, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Marek BanaszewskiInstitute of Cardiology, Intensive Cardiac Therapy Clinic, Warsaw, Poland.
Jose Silva CardosoDepartment of Cardiology, University of Porto, CINTESIS, Porto Medical School, São João Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Valentina CarubelliDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University and Civil Hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Salvatore Di SommaDepartment of Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza, Emergency Medicine Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Alexandre MebazaaINSERM U942, Hopital Lariboisiere, APHP and University Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
Veli-Pekka HarjolaEmergency Medicine, University of Helsinki and Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 340, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
CardShock study investigators
University of Helsinki · FIUniversidade do Porto · PTAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITCopenhagen University Hospital · DKInserm · FRInstitute of Cardiology · PLUniversity Hospital Brno · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVasopressors and inotropes remain a cornerstone in stabilization of the severely impaired hemodynamics and cardiac output in cardiogenic shock (CS). The aim of this study was to analyze current real-life use of these medications, and their impact on outcome and on changes in cardiac and renal biomarkers over time in CS.

methodsThe multinational CardShock study prospectively enrolled 219 patients with CS. The use of vasopressors and inotropes was analyzed in relation to the primary outcome, i.e., 90-day mortality, with propensity score methods in 216 patients with follow-up data available. Changes in cardiac and renal biomarkers over time until 96 hours from baseline were analyzed with linear mixed modeling.

resultsPatients were 67 (SD 12) years old, 26 % were women, and 28 % had been resuscitated from cardiac arrest prior to inclusion. On average, systolic blood pressure was 78 (14) and mean arterial pressure 57 (11) mmHg at detection of shock. 90-day mortality was 41 %. Vasopressors and/or inotropes were administered to 94 % of patients and initiated principally within the first 24 hours. Noradrenaline and adrenaline were given to 75 % and 21 % of patients, and 30 % received several vasopressors. In multivariable logistic regression, only adrenaline (21 %) was independently associated with increased 90-day mortality (OR 5.2, 95 % CI 1.88, 14.7, p = 0.002). The result was independent of prior cardiac arrest (39 % of patients treated with adrenaline), and the association remained in propensity-score-adjusted analysis among vasopressor-treated patients (OR 3.0, 95 % CI 1.3, 7.2, p = 0.013); this was further confirmed by propensity-score-matched analysis. Adrenaline was also associated, independent of prior cardiac arrest, with marked worsening of cardiac and renal biomarkers during the first days. Dobutamine and levosimendan were the most commonly used inotropes (49 % and 24 %). There were no differences in mortality, whether noradrenaline was combined with dobutamine or levosimendan.

conclusionAmong vasopressors and inotropes, adrenaline was independently associated with 90-day mortality in CS. Moreover, adrenaline use was associated with marked worsening in cardiac and renal biomarkers. The combined use of noradrenaline with either dobutamine or levosimendan appeared prognostically similar.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCardiotonic AgentsEpinephrineFemaleHemodynamicsHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreShock, CardiogenicTissue SurvivalVasoconstrictor AgentsCardiotonic AgentsEpinephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsAdrenalineCardiogenic shockInotropesMortalityPropensity scoreSurvivalVasoactive medicationVasopressors

Identifiers

PMID27374027
PMCPMC4931696
OpenAlexW2472746779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.