Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27373835›Full record

ArticleNeuron2016

Behavior Reveals Selective Summation and Max Pooling among Olfactory Processing Channels.

Joseph S Bell, Rachel I Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sensory processing reformats odor coding around valence and dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Ecological cues orchestrate concerted courtship in abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The fruit fly,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. A vector-based strategy for olfactory navigation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. An integrated anatomical, functional and evolutionary view of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Parallel encoding of COCurrent biology : CB · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Valence opponency in peripheral olfactory processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joseph S BellDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Rachel I WilsonDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: rachel_wilson@hms.harvard.edu.

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM007753 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WALENSKY, LOREN DAVID · 1985 to 2021
$50.0M
Viral ModuleP30EY012196 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI Gabriel Kreiman · 1998 to 2026
$21.3M
Synaptic and Circuit Mechanisms of Olfactory ProcessingR01DC008174 · NIDCD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WILSON, RACHEL · 2006 to 2021
$5.5M
Integrative Functional Mapping of Sensory-Motor PathwaysU01NS090514 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DICKINSON, MICHAEL H, HOLMES, PHILIP J · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008174NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007753NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The olfactory system is divided into processing channels (glomeruli), each receiving input from a different type of olfactory receptor neuron (ORN). Here we investigated how glomeruli combine to control behavior in freely walking Drosophila. We found that optogenetically activating single ORN types typically produced attraction, although some ORN types produced repulsion. Attraction consisted largely of a behavioral program with the following rules: at fictive odor onset, flies walked upwind, and at fictive odor offset, they reversed. When certain pairs of attractive ORN types were co-activated, the level of the behavioral response resembled the sum of the component responses. However, other pairs of attractive ORN types produced a response resembling the larger component (max pooling). Although activation of different ORN combinations produced different levels of behavior, the rules of the behavioral program were consistent. Our results illustrate a general method for inferring how groups of neurons work together to modulate behavioral programs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrosophila melanogasterOdorantsOlfactory PathwaysOlfactory Receptor NeuronsReceptors, OdorantSmellReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID27373835
PMCPMC5217404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.