Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27373816›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Temporal windows of reproductive opportunity reinforce species barriers in a marine broadcast spawning assemblage.

Carla A Monteiro, Cristina Paulino, Rita Jacinto, Ester A Serrão, Gareth A Pearson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carla A MonteiroCCMAR, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
Cristina PaulinoCCMAR, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
Rita JacintoCCMAR, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
Ester A SerrãoCCMAR, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
Gareth A PearsonCCMAR, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
University of Algarve · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prezygotic isolating mechanisms act to limit hybridization and maintain the genetic identity of closely-related species. While synchronous intraspecific spawning is a common phenomenon amongst marine organisms and plays an important role in reproductive success, asynchronous spawning between potentially hybridizing lineages may also be important in maintaining species boundaries. We tested this hypothesis by comparing reproductive synchrony over daily to hourly timescales in a sympatric assemblage of intertidal fucoid algae containing selfing hermaphroditic (Fucus spiralis and Fucus guiryi) and dioecious (Fucus vesiculosus and Fucus serratus) species. Our results confirm that gametes are released on semi-lunar cycles in all species. However, sister species with different mating systems showed asynchronous spawning at finer circadian timescales, thus providing evidence for a partial reproductive barrier between hermaphroditic and dioecious species. Finally, our data also emphasize the ecological, developmental, and/or physiological constraints that operate to restrict reproduction to narrow temporal windows of opportunity in the intertidal zone and more generally the role of ecological factors in marine speciation.

Indexed as

EcosystemCircadian RhythmFucusPeriodicityReproductionSpecies SpecificityWater Movements

Identifiers

PMID27373816
PMCPMC4931575
OpenAlexW2465563019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.