Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27373539›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2016

Breeding system diversification and evolution in American Poa supersect. Homalopoa (Poaceae: Poeae: Poinae).

Liliana M Giussani, Lynn J Gillespie, M Amalia Scataglini, María A Negritto, Ana M Anton, Robert J Soreng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. DioeciousAoB PLANTS · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Trioecy in Flowering Plants.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. PhytoKeys · 2020
    Article
  8. Eocene "PhytoKeys · 2020
    Article
  9. Updated checklist ofPhytoKeys · 2018
    Article
  10. PhytoKeys · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liliana M GiussaniInstituto de Botánica Darwinion, San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina lgiussani@darwin.edu.ar.
Lynn J GillespieResearch and Collections Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
M Amalia ScatagliniInstituto de Botánica Darwinion, San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María A NegrittoUniversidad de Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia.
Ana M AntonInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV), CONICET-UNC, Córdoba, Argentina.
Robert J SorengDepartment of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPoa subgenus Poa supersect. Homalopoa has diversified extensively in the Americas. Over half of the species in the supersection are diclinous; most of these are from the New World, while a few are from South-East Asia. Diclinism in Homalopoa can be divided into three main types: gynomonoecism, gynodioecism and dioecism. Here the sampling of species of New World Homalopoa is expanded to date its origin and diversification in North and South America and examine the evolution and origin of the breeding system diversity.

methodsA total of 124 specimens were included in the matrix, of which 89 are species of Poa supersect. Homalopoa sections Acutifoliae, Anthochloa, Brizoides, Dasypoa, Dioicopoa, Dissanthelium, Homalopoa sensu lato (s.l.), Madropoa and Tovarochloa, and the informal Punapoa group. Bayesian and parsimony analyses were conducted on the data sets based on four markers: the nuclear ribosomal internal tanscribed spacer (ITS) and external transcribed spacer (ETS), and plastid trnT-L and trnL-F. Dating analyses were performed on a reduced Poa matrix and enlarged Poaceae outgroup to utilize fossils as calibration points. A relaxed Bayesian molecular clock method was used. KEY

resultsHermaphroditism appears to be pleisiomorphic in the monophyletic Poa supersect. Homalopoa, which is suggested to have originated in Eurasia 8·4-4·2 million years ago (Mya). The ancestor of Poa supersect. Homalopoa radiated throughout the New World in the Late Miocene-Early Pliocene, with major lineages originating during the Pliocene to Pleistocene (5-2 Mya). Breeding systems are linked to geographic areas, showing an evolutionary pattern associated with different habitats. At least three major pathways from hermaphroditism to diclinism are inferred in New World Homalopoa: two leading to dioecism, one via gynodioecism in South America and another directly from hermaphroditism in North America, a result that needs to be checked with a broader sampling of diclinous species in North America. A third pathway leads from hermaphroditism to gynomonoecism in Andean species of South America, with strictly pistillate species evolving in the highest altitudes.

conclusionsDivergence dating provides a temporal context to the evolution of breeding systems in New World Poa supersect. Homalopoa The results are consistent with the infrageneric classification in part; monophyletic sections are confirmed, it is proposed to reclassify species of sect. Acutifoliae, Dasypoa and Homalopoa s.l. and it is acknowledged that revision of the infrageneric taxonomy of the gynomonoecious species is needed.

Indexed as

Plant BreedingBayes TheoremBiological EvolutionDNA, PlantDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFlowersFossilsNorth AmericaPhylogenyPlastidsPoaPoaceaeSequence Analysis, DNASouth AmericaDNA, PlantDNA, Ribosomal SpacerBreeding systemdiclinismdioecismDNAgynodioecismgynomonoecismHomalopoamolecular datingmolecular phylogenyNorth AmericaPoaSouth America

Identifiers

PMID27373539
PMCPMC4970369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.