Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27373207›Full record

ReviewPreventive medicine2016

Food reinforcement during infancy.

Kai Ling Kong, Leonard H Epstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Preventive medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kai Ling KongDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14214-3000, United States. Electronic address: kkong4@buffalo.edu.
Leonard H EpsteinDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14214-3000, United States. Electronic address: lhenet@buffalo.edu.

Funding

Habituation to food as a risk factor for pediatric obesityR01DK090106 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2012 to 2016
$2.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK090106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The motivation to eat, as operationalized by measuring how hard someone will work for food, is cross-sectionally and prospectively related to obesity. Persons high in food reinforcement consume more calories, and energy intake mediates the relationship between food reinforcement and obesity. Research has shown avid sucking for milk in early infancy predicts later adiposity, and the relationship between food reinforcement and excess body weight has been observed in infants as young as 9months of age. New methodological developments in studying food reinforcement in infants and young children provide the first opportunity to study the origin of food reinforcement. This review seeks to provide background on the measurement of food reinforcement, and to present, for the first time, prenatal and postnatal predictors of infant food reinforcement. Lastly, potential mechanisms for an increasing trajectory of food reinforcement throughout development are proposed.

Indexed as

FoodFood PreferencesReinforcement, PsychologyEatingHumansInfantMotivationObesityWeight GainDevelopmentFood reinforcementInfancyObesity

Identifiers

PMID27373207
PMCPMC5361189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.