Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27373186›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2016

Differential sensitivity to learning from positive and negative outcomes in cocaine users.

Justin C Strickland, B Levi Bolin, Joshua A Lile, Craig R Rush, William W Stoops

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Baseline cocaine demand predicts contingency management treatment outcomes for cocaine-use disorder.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin C StricklandDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky Arts and Sciences, 110 Kastle Hall, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA.
B Levi BolinDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 1100 Veterans Drive, Medical Behavioral Science Building Room 140, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA.
Joshua A LileDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky Arts and Sciences, 110 Kastle Hall, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 1100 Veterans Drive, Medical Behavioral Science Building Room 140, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 3470 Blazer Parkway, Lexington, KY 40509-1810, USA.
Craig R RushDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky Arts and Sciences, 110 Kastle Hall, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 1100 Veterans Drive, Medical Behavioral Science Building Room 140, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 3470 Blazer Parkway, Lexington, KY 40509-1810, USA.
William W StoopsDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky Arts and Sciences, 110 Kastle Hall, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 1100 Veterans Drive, Medical Behavioral Science Building Room 140, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 3470 Blazer Parkway, Lexington, KY 40509-1810, USA. Electronic address: william.stoops@uky.edu.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

A Novel Anti Obesity Drug Combination as a Pharmacotherapy for Cocaine DependenceR01DA032254 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI RUSH, CRAIG R · 2012 to 2015
$1.9M
Medications Development for Cocaine: A Translational Approach in Monkey and HumanR01DA033364 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LILE, JOSHUA ANTHONY · 2013 to 2016
$1.9M
Targeting GABA and Opioid Systems for a Pharmacotherapy for Methamphetamine AbuseR01DA033394 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI RUSH, CRAIG R · 2013 to 2015
$1.8M
Agonist Replacement Therapy for Methamphetamine Dependence: Human Lab StudiesR01DA025032 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI RUSH, CRAIG R · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
Selective Monoamine Release as a Treatment for Cocaine Use DisordersR01DA036553 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
Motivation for Cocaine and Non-Drug Reinforcers: Targeting Glutamate HomeostasisR21DA035376 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2014 to 2015
$376k
Buspirone as a Candidate Medication for Methamphetamine AbuseR21DA035481 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI RUSH, CRAIG R · 2013 to 2014
$374k
A Human Laboratory Study to Investigate Buspirone for Cocaine Use DisordersR21DA034095 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2012 to 2013
$363k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025032NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032254NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033364NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033394NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036553NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA034095NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA035376NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA035481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAltered sensitivity to positive and negative outcomes may be linked to the maladaptive choices characteristic of substance use disorders. Few studies have determined the distinct roles that positive and negative outcomes play in stimulus-response learning in cocaine users. The purpose of the present study was to investigate sensitivity to learning from positive and negative outcomes on a probabilistic learning task in cocaine users employing human laboratory and crowdsourcing techniques.

methodsIndividuals who reported cocaine use were recruited for a laboratory study (Experiment 1) or an online study on Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk (mTurk) (Experiment 2). All participants completed a feedback-based probabilistic learning task in which images were classified into categories (A versus B). Positive and negative outcomes were provided in a probabilistic manner on separate trials. Proportion of optimal responses and response times were recorded.

resultsActive cocaine users were less sensitive to learning from positive relative to negative outcomes. These effects were consistent across image type and session in the laboratory sample. Similarly, reduced sensitivity to learning from positive outcomes was observed in cocaine users on mTurk. Control participants did not show suboptimal performance following positive or negative outcomes.

conclusionsThis study extends the limited research on feedback-based learning in drug users by demonstrating reduced sensitivity to positive outcomes in cocaine users recruited in the human laboratory and online. Future studies on the clinical significance and mechanisms underlying this bias are needed to understand its relevance as a target for intervention development.

Indexed as

AdultChoice BehaviorCocaine-Related DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceBiasDecision-makingDrugInternetmTurkProbabilistic learning

Identifiers

PMID27373186
PMCPMC4983518
OpenAlexW2463356146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.