ReviewBrain stimulation
Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.
Review in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 23 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 671 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Rehabilitative Trial for the Recovery of Neurophysiological Parameters in Progranulin Mutation Carriers Through the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Post-Stroke Working Memory Deficits
Rehabilitative Trial With Cerebello-Spinal tDCS for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Ataxia
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): A Therapeutic Intervention for Motor Impairments in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD).
The Impact of Concurrent Brain Stimulation and Working Memory Training on Cognitive Performance in Acquired Brain Injury
Cerebello-Spinal tDCS as Rehabilitative Intervention in Neurodegenerative Ataxias: a Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Trial Followed by an Open-label Phase
Recovering Arm Function in Chronic Post-stroke Patients Using Combined HD-tDCS and Virtual Reality Therapy
The Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: a Double Blind, Sham Controlled, Randomized Factorial Designed Study for Anxiety Disorders
Improving Aphasia Outcomes Through tDCS-Mediated Attention Management
Effects of Non-invasive Neuromodulation on Food Desire, Chewing Pattern, Executive Functions and Biochemical Markers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress
Pilot Testing of tDCS and Metacognitive Strategy Training in Chronic Stroke
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Inhibitory Control in Addictions: a Triple-blinded, Sham-controlled Clinical Trial.
Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cognition in Subacute Stroke
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Neurodegeneration and Neuromotor Recovery on Post-stroke Patients. a Pilot Study
Impulsivity Mediation Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Paired With Acceptance Commitment Therapy as an Adjunctive Therapy for Substance Use Disorder
TACS for the Recovery of Phonological STM After Stroke
Machine-Learning Based EEG Biomarkers for Personalized Interventions
Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Functionality and Pain in Individuals With Patellar Tendinopathy: Randomized Clinical Trial
Home-based Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) in Alzheimer's Disease
Acute Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Technical, Expressive, and Scenic Aspects of Musical Performance in Young Orchestra Instrumentalists: A Proof-of-Concept Study
Biological and Psychological Markers After Trancranial Electrical Stimulation in Adults With Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Glutamate Changes as a New Neurocognitive Marker in Psychosis
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Fatigue, Mood, and Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Crossover Trial
Who cites it
671 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Research trends and knowledge mapping of transcranial direct current stimulation in depression: a bibliometric study based on web of science, Scopus, and PubMed (2000-2025).Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with rehabilitation training for chronic spinal pain: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Completion rate and safety of non-invasive brain stimulation for upper limb dysfunction after stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques on cognitive function in individuals with Alzheimer's disease and MCI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on patients with depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in psychiatric disorders in early childhood (aged under 10 years): a systematic review.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on balance control in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Acupuncture treatment of vascular cognitive impairment through peripheral nerve stimulation pathway: a scoping review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy of transcranial random noise stimulation in treating tinnitus: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and young people with psychiatric disorders: a systematic review.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluating the effects of tDCS on depressive and anxiety symptoms from a transdiagnostic perspective: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Translational psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with dysphagia after stroke: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Pooled it
- Towards optimized methodological parameters for maximizing the behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Uncorking the limitation-improving dual tasking using transcranial electrical stimulation and task training in the elderly: a systematic review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Outcomes From Use of the Fédération International de Football Association (FIFA) 11⁺ Program With and Without Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in 60 Male High School Soccer Players.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Trial
- Modulating task-outcome value to mitigate real-world procrastination via noninvasive brain stimulation.eLife · 2026Trial
- Baseline cognition and stimulation site shape the effects of tdcs on verbal fluency in older and younger adults.GeroScience · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of transcranial alternating current stimulation in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Trial
611 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review updates and consolidates evidence on the safety of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Safety is here operationally defined by, and limited to, the absence of evidence for a Serious Adverse Effect, the criteria for which are rigorously defined. This review adopts an evidence-based approach, based on an aggregation of experience from human trials, taking care not to confuse speculation on potential hazards or lack of data to refute such speculation with evidence for risk. Safety data from animal tests for tissue damage are reviewed with systematic consideration of translation to humans. Arbitrary safety considerations are avoided. Computational models are used to relate dose to brain exposure in humans and animals. We review relevant dose-response curves and dose metrics (e.g. current, duration, current density, charge, charge density) for meaningful safety standards. Special consideration is given to theoretically vulnerable populations including children and the elderly, subjects with mood disorders, epilepsy, stroke, implants, and home users. Evidence from relevant animal models indicates that brain injury by Direct Current Stimulation (DCS) occurs at predicted brain current densities (6.3-13 A/m(2)) that are over an order of magnitude above those produced by conventional tDCS. To date, the use of conventional tDCS protocols in human trials (≤40 min, ≤4 milliamperes, ≤7.2 Coulombs) has not produced any reports of a Serious Adverse Effect or irreversible injury across over 33,200 sessions and 1000 subjects with repeated sessions. This includes a wide variety of subjects, including persons from potentially vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.