Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27372293›Full record

SynthesisCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2016

Systematic review of the use of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced melanoma.

Christoph Hoeller, Olivier Michielin, Paolo A Ascierto, Zsolt Szabo, Christian U Blank

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Cancer microenvironment and genomics: evolution in process.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Step-by-Step Immune Activation for Suicide Gene Therapy Reinforcement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Results of redo pulmonary metastasectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Christoph HoellerDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. christoph.hoeller@meduniwien.ac.at.
Olivier MichielinDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Champ de l'Air, Rue du Bugnon 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Paolo A AsciertoIstituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione 'G. Pascale', Via Mariano Semmola, 52, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Zsolt SzaboClinical Development, Amgen Europe GmbH, Dammstrasse 23, 6300, Zug, Switzerland.
Christian U BlankDivision of Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amgen (Switzerland) · CHIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITMedical University of Vienna · ATThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several immunomodulatory checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma, including ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Talimogene laherparepvec is the first oncolytic virus to gain regulatory approval in the USA; it is also approved in Europe. Talimogene laherparepvec expresses granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and with other GM-CSF-expressing oncolytic viruses in development, understanding the clinical relevance of this cytokine in treating advanced melanoma is important. Results of trials of GM-CSF in melanoma have been mixed, and while GM-CSF has the potential to promote anti-tumor responses, some preclinical data suggest that GM-CSF may sometimes promote tumor growth. GM-CSF has not been approved as a melanoma treatment. We undertook a systematic literature review of studies of GM-CSF in patients with advanced melanoma (stage IIIB-IV). Of the 503 articles identified, 26 studies met the eligibility criteria. Most studies investigated the use of GM-CSF in combination with another treatment, such as peptide vaccines or chemotherapy, or as an adjuvant to surgery. Some clinical benefit was reported in patients who received GM-CSF as an adjuvant to surgery, or in combination with other treatments. In general, outcomes for patients receiving peptide vaccines were not improved with the addition of GM-CSF. GM-CSF may be a valuable therapeutic adjuvant; however, further studies are needed, particularly head-to-head comparisons, to confirm the optimal dosing regimen and clinical effectiveness in patients with advanced melanoma.

Indexed as

Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorEfficacyGM-CSFGranulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factorImmunotherapyMelanoma

Identifiers

PMID27372293
PMCPMC4995227
OpenAlexW2463781662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.