Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27371952›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Scan-o-matic: High-Resolution Microbial Phenomics at a Massive Scale.

Martin Zackrisson, Johan Hallin, Lars-Göran Ottosson, Peter Dahl, Esteban Fernandez-Parada, Erik Ländström, Luciano Fernandez-Ricaud, Petra Kaferle, Andreas Skyman, Simon Stenberg and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New reporters for monitoring cellular NMD.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Integrative analysis of yeast colony growth.Communications biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Martin ZackrissonDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden.
Johan HallinIRCAN, CNRS UMR 6267, INSERM U998, University of Nice, 06107, France.
Lars-Göran OttossonDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden.
Peter DahlDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden.
Esteban Fernandez-ParadaDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden.
Erik LändströmDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden.
Luciano Fernandez-RicaudDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden.
Petra KaferleDepartment of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, Jožef Stefan Institute, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Andreas SkymanDepartment of Earth and Space Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Simon StenbergDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Centre for Integrative Genetics (CIGENE), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB), 1432 Ås, Norway.
Stig OmholtDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Uroš PetrovičDepartment of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, Jožef Stefan Institute, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-9743-9145
Jonas WarringerDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Centre for Integrative Genetics (CIGENE), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB), 1432 Ås, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5269-971X
Anders BlombergDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden anders.blomberg@marine.gu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capacity to map traits over large cohorts of individuals-phenomics-lags far behind the explosive development in genomics. For microbes, the estimation of growth is the key phenotype because of its link to fitness. We introduce an automated microbial phenomics framework that delivers accurate, precise, and highly resolved growth phenotypes at an unprecedented scale. Advancements were achieved through the introduction of transmissive scanning hardware and software technology, frequent acquisition of exact colony population size measurements, extraction of population growth rates from growth curves, and removal of spatial bias by reference-surface normalization. Our prototype arrangement automatically records and analyzes close to 100,000 growth curves in parallel. We demonstrate the power of the approach by extending and nuancing the known salt-defense biology in baker's yeast. The introduced framework represents a major advance in microbial phenomics by providing high-quality data for extensive cohorts of individuals and generating well-populated and standardized phenomics databases.

Indexed as

SoftwareDatabases, GeneticGenetic FitnessGenomicsHumansPhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiaegeneticshigh throughputmicrobiologyphenomicsscreening

Identifiers

PMID27371952
PMCPMC5015956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.