Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27371833›Full record

ArticleGenetics2016

The Evolutionary Fates of a Large Segmental Duplication in Mouse.

Andrew P Morgan, J Matthew Holt, Rachel C McMullan, Timothy A Bell, Amelia M-F Clayshulte, John P Didion, Liran Yadgary, David Thybert, Duncan T Odom, Paul Flicek and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An egg sabotaging mechanism drives non-Mendelian transmission in mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Multiple genome viewer (MGV): a new tool for visualization and comparison of multiple annotated genomes.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Population Genomics of the House Mouse and the Brown Rat.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Sequence and Structural Diversity of Mouse Y Chromosomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andrew P MorganDepartment of Genetics and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1942-4543
J Matthew HoltDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Rachel C McMullanDepartment of Genetics and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Timothy A BellDepartment of Genetics and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Amelia M-F ClayshulteDepartment of Genetics and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
John P DidionDepartment of Genetics and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Liran YadgaryDepartment of Genetics and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
David ThybertEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.
Duncan T OdomCancer Research United Kingdom Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, CB2 0RE, United Kingdom Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Paul FlicekEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, United Kingdom Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Leonard McMillanDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Fernando Pardo-Manuel de VillenaDepartment of Genetics and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 fernando@med.unc.edu.

Funding

Unlocking Zika Virus Immune Control and Pathogenesis with the Collaborative CrossU19AI100625 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HEISE, MARK T · 2012 to 2021
$36.6M
UNC and PERLEGEN, IncP50GM076468 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI GRABER, JOEL H · 2006 to 2015
$31.0M
UNC Predoc Training Progr in Bioinformatics/Comp BiologyT32GM067553 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELSTON, TIMOTHY C · 2005 to 2019
$2.5M
Effects of advanced paternal age on germline genome stabilityF30MH103925 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, ANDREW PARKER · 2014 to 2017
$151k
Cancer Research UK 20412NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI100625NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076468NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM067553NIMH NIH HHS F30 MH103925Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplication and loss are major sources of genetic polymorphism in populations, and are important forces shaping the evolution of genome content and organization. We have reconstructed the origin and history of a 127-kbp segmental duplication, R2d, in the house mouse (Mus musculus). R2d contains a single protein-coding gene, Cwc22 De novo assembly of both the ancestral (R2d1) and the derived (R2d2) copies reveals that they have been subject to nonallelic gene conversion events spanning tens of kilobases. R2d2 is also a hotspot for structural variation: its diploid copy number ranges from zero in the mouse reference genome to >80 in wild mice sampled from around the globe. Hemizygosity for high copy-number alleles of R2d2 is associated in cis with meiotic drive; suppression of meiotic crossovers; and copy-number instability, with a mutation rate in excess of 1 per 100 transmissions in some laboratory populations. Our results provide a striking example of allelic diversity generated by duplication and demonstrate the value of de novo assembly in a phylogenetic context for understanding the mutational processes affecting duplicate genes.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGene DuplicationSegmental Duplications, GenomicAllelesAnimalsAnimals, WildEvolution, MolecularGene ConversionGene DosageGenes, DuplicateGenetic VariationMiceNuclear ProteinsPhylogenyRNA-Binding ProteinsCWC22 protein, mouseNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding Proteinscopy-number variationmeiotic drivesegmental duplications

Identifiers

PMID27371833
PMCPMC5012392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.