Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27371808›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2016

Creation of a protective pulmonary bioshield against inhaled organophosphates using an aerosolized bioscavenger.

Yvonne J Rosenberg, James B Fink

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yvonne J RosenbergPlantVax Inc, Rockville, Maryland.
James B FinkDepartment of Respiratory Care, Georgia State, University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Georgia State University · USRegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

Efficacy and Safety of an Aerosolized Recombinant Butyrylcholinesterase PretreatmR44NS064608 · NINDS · PLANTVAX, INC. · PI ROSENBERG, YVONNE J · 2013 to 2015
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R44 NS064608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to the global use of organophosphate (OP) pesticides for agriculture, OP nerve agents and pesticides have been employed on battlefields and by terrorists (e.g., a recent sarin attack in Syria). These occurrences highlight the need for an effective countermeasure against OP exposure. Human butyrylcholinesterase (HuBChE) is a leading candidate, but injection of the high doses required for protection present pharmacokinetic challenges. An aerosolized recombinant form (aer-rHuBChE) that can neutralize inhaled OPs at the portal of entry has been assessed for its efficacy in protecting macaques against respiratory toxicity following inhalation exposure to the pesticide paraoxon (aer-Px). While protection in macaques has been demonstrated using the MicroSprayer® delivery device, administration to humans will likely employ a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN). Compared to the 50-70% lung deposition achieved in adult humans with a VMN, deposition in macaques is <5%, an initial major obstacle to demonstrating protection. Such problems have been partly overcome by using a more efficient modified VMN and proportionally higher doses, which together generate an effective rHuBChE pulmonary bioshield and protect against high levels of inhaled Px.

Indexed as

AerosolsAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansInhalation ExposureLungOrganophosphorus CompoundsProtective AgentsAerosolsOrganophosphorus CompoundsProtective Agentsbutyrylcholinesteraseinhaled neurotoxinsmacaquesprotectionpulmonary

Identifiers

PMID27371808
PMCPMC4973617
OpenAlexW2462118178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.