ArticleDiabetes research and clinical practice2016
Comparison of screening scores for diabetes and prediabetes.
Article in Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- A dual domain systematic review and meta-analysis of risk tool accuracy to predict cardiovascular morbidity in prehypertension and diabetic morbidity in prediabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Snapshot of Diabetes Risk, Risk Awareness, and Lifestyle Change Factors in Older Adults Attending Delaware Senior Centers.Delaware journal of public health · 2026Article
- Development of a future prediabetes risk assessment model for individuals with normal glucose levels using data envelopment analysis.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- Advances in gestational diabetes mellitus screening: Emerging trends and future directions.World journal of diabetes · 2025Review
- 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.Diabetes care · 2025Review
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Glycemic Control in an Adult Without Diabetes: Over 4,000 Automated Recordings Guide Contingency-Shaped Learning.Telemedicine reports · 2025Article
- Starting the Conversation: Patient Perceptions of Self-Assessed Type-2 Diabetes Risk.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Youth Diabetes Epidemiological Data Set and Web Portal: Resource Development and Case Studies.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.Diabetes care · 2024Review
- Optimizing an mHealth Program to Promote Type 2 Diabetes Prevention in High-Risk Individuals: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- The Role of Pharmacists and Community Pharmacies in the Screening, Knowledge, and Awareness of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 in Jordanian People Visiting Community Pharmacies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.Diabetes care · 2023 · on this mapReview
- Performance of Diabetes and Kidney Disease Screening Scores in Contemporary United States and Korean Populations.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2022Article
- Implementation of a Prediabetes Risk Test for an Underserved Population in a Federally Qualified Health Center.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2022Article
- The Validity of the American Diabetes Association's Diabetes Risk Test in a Saudi Arabian Population.Cureus · 2021Article
- Prediabetes/diabetes screening strategy at the periodontal clinic.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2021Article
- Biomarker Score in Risk Prediction: Beyond Scientific Evidence and Statistical Performance.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2020Article
- A combined strategy of feature selection and machine learning to identify predictors of prediabetes.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- The Efficacy of New Chinese Diabetes Risk Score in Screening Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes and Prediabetes: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study in Eastern China.Journal of diabetes research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThere are numerous risk or screening scores for the prediction of type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM). In contrast, few scores are available for preDM. In this paper, we compare the two screening scores from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that can be used for DM as well as preDM.
methodsAdult participants (N=9391) without known DM from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2009-12 were included. We fitted the factors/items in the ADA and CDC scores in logistic regression with the outcomes of undiagnosed DM, preDM, and combination, and assessed the association and discrimination accuracy. We also evaluated the suggested cutpoints that define high risk individuals. We mimicked the original models/settings but also tested various deviations/modifications often encountered in practice.
resultsBoth scores performed well and robustly, while the ADA score performed somewhat better (e.g., AUC=0.77 for ADA and 0.73-0.74 for CDC for DM; 0.72-0.74 and 0.70-0.71 for preDM). The same predictors and scoring rules seem to be reasonably justified with different cutpoints for DM and preDM, which can make usage easier and consistent. Some factors such as race and HDL/LDL cholesterols may be useful additions to health education.
conclusionsCurrent DM education and screening focus on the prevention and management of DM. The ADA and CDC scores could further help when we identify individuals at high risk for preDM, and teach the importance of preDM during which lifestyle intervention can be effective and urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.