Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27371719›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2016

An evaluation of the effect of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on the growth rate of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a randomized placebo-controlled trial (AARDVARK).

Colin D Bicknell, Gaia Kiru, Emanuela Falaschetti, Janet T Powell, Neil R Poulter, AARDVARK Collaborators

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Abdominal aortic aneurysm progression: A review of preclinical and clinical data.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Inverse finite element identification of murine aortic material properties:Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Dihydromyricetin mitigates abdominal aortic aneurysmActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colin D BicknellDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK colin.bicknell@imperial.ac.uk.
Gaia KiruImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Emanuela FalaschettiImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Janet T PowellDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Neil R PoulterImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
AARDVARK Collaborators
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/11/37/28819Department of Health 08/109/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe AARDVARK (Aortic Aneurysmal Regression of Dilation: Value of ACE-Inhibition on RisK) trial investigated whether ACE-inhibition reduces small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) growth rate, independent of blood pressure (BP) lowering. METHODS AND

resultsA three-arm, multi-centre, single-blind, and randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN51383267) was conducted in 14 hospitals in England. Subjects aged ≥55 years with AAA diameter 3.0-5.4 cm were randomized 1:1:1 to receive perindopril arginine 10 mg, or amlodipine 5 mg, or placebo and followed 3-6 monthly over 2 years. The primary outcome was aneurysm growth rate (based on external antero-posterior ultrasound measurements in the longitudinal plane), determined by multi-level modelling to provide maximum likelihood estimates. Two hundred and twenty-four subjects were randomized (2011-2013) to placebo (n = 79), perindopril (n = 73), or amlodipine (n = 72). Mean (SD) changes in mid-trial systolic BP (12 months) were 0.5 (14.3) mmHg, P = 0.78 compared with baseline, -9.5 (13.1) mmHg (P < 0.001), and -6.7 (12.0) mmHg (P < 0.001), respectively. No significant differences in the modelled annual growth rates were apparent [1.68 mm (SE 0.2), 1.77 mm (0.2), and 1.81 mm (0.2), respectively]. The estimated difference in annual growth between the perindopril and placebo groups was 0.08 mm (CI -0.50, 0.65). Similar numbers of AAAs in each group reached 5.5 cm diameter and/or underwent elective surgery: 11 receiving placebo, 10 perindopril, and 11 amlodipine.

conclusionSmall AAA growth rates were lower than anticipated, but there was no significant impact of perindopril compared with placebo or placebo and amlodipine, combined despite more effective BP lowering.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDouble-Blind MethodEnglandHumansHypertensionLikelihood FunctionsMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsAbdominal aortic aneurysmACE-inhibitionBlood pressure loweringCalcium channel blockerPerindoprilPlacebo-controlled

Identifiers

PMID27371719
PMCPMC5181384
OpenAlexW2470244109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.