Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27371698›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2016

Long-term follow-up results of the multicenter phase II trial of regorafenib in patients with metastatic and/or unresectable GI stromal tumor after failure of standard tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

E Ben-Ami, C M Barysauskas, M von Mehren, M C Heinrich, C L Corless, J E Butrynski, J A Morgan, A J Wagner, E Choy, J T Yap and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01068769 (A Multi-center Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Patients With Metastatic and/or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor), which is not on this map. Cited by 79 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01068769 phase2completednot on this map

A Multi-center Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Patients With Metastatic and/or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST), Resistent or Intolerant to at Least Imatinib and Sunitinib

TypeinterventionalSponsorSuzanne George, MDRan2010 to 2020Enrolled34ConditionsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorArmsregorafenib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. SEOM-GEIS clinical guideline for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (2022).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Phase II Study of Ponatinib in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Efficacy, Safety, and Impact of Liquid Biopsy and Other Biomarkers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  11. Linsitinib (OSI-906) for the Treatment of Adult and Pediatric Wild-Type Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, a SARC Phase II Study.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Trial
  12. A Phase II Trial of Vandetanib in Children and Adults with Succinate Dehydrogenase-Deficient Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Updated Asian consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (2025).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

E Ben-AmiCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.
C M BarysauskasDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.
M von MehrenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia.
M C HeinrichVA Portland Health Care System and Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
C L CorlessOregon Health and Science University, Portland.
J E ButrynskiCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.
J A MorganCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.
A J WagnerCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.
E ChoyDivision of Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
J T YapHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
A D Van den AbbeeleDepartment of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Department of Radiology.
S M SolomonCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.
J A FletcherDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.
G D DemetriCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Department of Ludwig Center at Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
S GeorgeCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston suzanne_george@dfci.harvard.edu.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USOregon Health & Science University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

VectorP30CA006516 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI A. Heather Eliassen · 1985 to 2026
$330.6M
WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Regulation of oncogenic KIT by LMTK3I01BX000338 · VA · PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI HEINRICH, MICHAEL C · 2009 to 2019
–
BLRD VA I01 BX000338NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006516NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis investigator-initiated trial provided the justification for the phase III GRID study resulting in worldwide regulatory approval of regorafenib as a third-line therapy for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). We report the genotype analyses, long-term safety, and activity results from this initial trial of regorafenib in GIST. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe trial was conducted between February 2010 and January 2014, among adult patients with metastatic GIST, after failure of at least imatinib and sunitinib. Patients received regorafenib orally, 160 mg once daily, days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. Clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as complete or partial response (PR), or stable disease lasting ≥16 weeks per RECIST 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), long-term safety data, and metabolic response by functional imaging were assessed.

resultsThirty-three patients received at least one dose of regorafenib. The median follow-up was 41 months. CBR was documented in 25 of 33 patients [76%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 58% to 89%], including six PRs. The median PFS was 13.2 months (95% CI 9.2-18.3 months) including four patients who remained progression-free at study closure, each achieving clinical benefit for more than 3 years (range 36.8-43.5 months). The median OS was 25 months (95% CI 13.2-39.1 months). Patients whose tumors harbored a KIT exon 11 mutation demonstrated the longest median PFS (13.4 months), whereas patients with KIT/PDGFRA wild-type, non-SDH-deficient tumors experienced a median 1.6 months PFS (P < 0.0001). Long-term safety profile is consistent with previous reports; hand-foot skin reaction and hypertension were the most common reasons for dose reduction. Notably, regorafenib induced objective responses and durable benefit in SDH-deficient GIST.

conclusionsLong-term follow-up of patients with metastatic GIST treated with regorafenib suggests particular benefit among patients with primary KIT exon 11 mutations and those with SDH-deficient GIST. Dose modifications are frequently required to manage treatment-related toxicities. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01068769.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsGenotypeHumansImatinib MesylateIndolesMaleMiddle AgedMutationPhenylurea CompoundsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitImatinib MesylateIndolesPhenylurea CompoundsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitPyridinesPyrrolesregorafenibSunitinibGISTKIT mutationregorafenibSDH-deficient GIST

Identifiers

PMID27371698
PMCPMC6279099
OpenAlexW2461823061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.