Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27371585›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2016

A Rapid Method for Quantifying Viable Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Cellular Infection Assays.

Hannah B Pooley, Kumudika de Silva, Auriol C Purdie, Douglas J Begg, Richard J Whittington, Karren M Plain

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah B PooleyFaculty of Veterinary Science, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia.
Kumudika de SilvaFaculty of Veterinary Science, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia.
Auriol C PurdieFaculty of Veterinary Science, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia.
Douglas J BeggFaculty of Veterinary Science, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia.
Richard J WhittingtonFaculty of Veterinary Science, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia.
Karren M PlainFaculty of Veterinary Science, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia karren.plain@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledDetermining the viability of bacteria is a key outcome of in vitro cellular infection assays. Currently, this is done by culture, which is problematic for fastidious slow-growing bacteria such as Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis, where it can take up to 4 months to confirm growth. This study aimed to identify an assay that can rapidly quantify the number of viable M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis cells in a cellular sample. Three commercially available bacterial viability assays along with a modified liquid culture method coupled with high-throughput quantitative PCR growth detection were assessed. Criteria for assessment included the ability of each assay to differentiate live and dead M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis organisms and their accuracy at low bacterial concentrations. Using the culture-based method, M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis growth was reliably detected and quantified within 2 weeks. There was a strong linear association between the 2-week growth rate and the initial inoculum concentration. The number of viable M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis cells in an unknown sample was quantified based on the growth rate, by using growth standards. In contrast, none of the commercially available viability assays were suitable for use with samples from in vitro cellular infection assays. IMPORTANCE: Rapid quantification of the viability of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in samples from in vitro cellular infection assays is important, as it allows these assays to be carried out on a large scale. In vitro cellular infection assays can function as a preliminary screening tool, for vaccine development or antimicrobial screening, and also to extend findings derived from experimental animal trials. Currently, by using culture, it takes up to 4 months to obtain quantifiable results regarding M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis viability after an in vitro infection assay; however, with the quantitative PCR and liquid culture method developed, reliable results can be obtained at 2 weeks. This method will be important for vaccine and antimicrobial screening work, as it will allow a greater number of candidates to be screened in the same amount of time, which will increase the likelihood that a favorable candidate will be found to be subjected to further testing.

Indexed as

Microbial ViabilityAnimalsBacterial LoadMacrophagesMiceMycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosisRAW 264.7 CellsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID27371585
PMCPMC5007765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.