Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27371292›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2017

Early weight bearing versus delayed weight bearing in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Joris Radboud Lansdaal, Tanguy Mouton, Daniel Charles Wascher, Guillaume Demey, Sebastien Lustig, Philippe Neyret, Elvire Servien

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00799370 (Prospective Study on Postoperative Weight Bearing After Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00799370 nacompletednot on this map

Prospective Study on Postoperative Weight Bearing After Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO): Early Weight Bearing Versus Delayed. Open Labelled Randomized Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2008 to 2014Enrolled50ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsEarly weight bearing, Delayed weight bearing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. [Application progress of customized steel plates in osteotomy and orthopedic treatment of knee osteoarthritis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. High Tibial Osteotomy for Varus Deformity of the Knee.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Return to sports rate after opening wedge high tibial osteotomy in athletes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joris Radboud LansdaalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Centre Albert Trillat, Lyon University, 69004, Lyon, France.
Tanguy MoutonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Centre Albert Trillat, Lyon University, 69004, Lyon, France.
Daniel Charles WascherDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, MSC10 5600, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Guillaume DemeyClinique de la Sauvegarde, Lyon Ortho Clinic, 29B Avenue des Sources, 69009, Lyon, France.
Sebastien LustigDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Centre Albert Trillat, Lyon University, 69004, Lyon, France.
Philippe NeyretDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Centre Albert Trillat, Lyon University, 69004, Lyon, France.
Elvire ServienDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Centre Albert Trillat, Lyon University, 69004, Lyon, France. elvire.servien@chu-lyon.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe need for a period of non-weight bearing after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy remains controversial. It is hypothesized that immediate weight bearing after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy would have no difference in functional scores at one year compared to delayed weight bearing.

methodsFifty patients, median age 54 years (range 40-65), with medial compartment osteoarthritis, underwent a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy utilizing a locking plate without bone grafting. Patients were randomized into an Immediate or a Delayed (2 months) weight bearing group. All patients were assessed at one-year follow-up and the two groups compared. The primary outcome measure was the IKS score. Secondary outcome measures included the IKDC score, the VAS pain score and rate of complications.

resultsThe functional scores significantly improved in both groups. The IKS score increased from 142 ± 31 to 171 ± 26 in the Immediate group (p < 0.001) and from 148 ± 22 to 178 ± 23 in the Delayed group (p < 0.001). The IKDC score increased from 49 ± 17 pre-operatively to 68 ± 14 one-year post-operatively in the Immediate group (p < 0.0001) and from 44 ± 16 to 69 ± 19 in the Delayed group (p < 0.001). The average VAS for pain 2 months after surgery was 3 ± 3 in the Immediate group and 3 ± 2 in the Delayed (n.s.). There was no significant difference between the two groups in any of the outcome measures. The mean mechanical femorotibial angle changed from 6° of varus (0°-15° of varus, SD = 3°) to 4° of valgus (5°-11° of valgus, SD = 3°) in the Immediate group and from 5° of varus (0°-10° of varus, SD = 3°) to 3° of valgus (2° of varus to 8° of valgus, SD = 3°) in the Delayed group. No difference was seen between groups, and no loss of correction was observed in any patient. Two cases of non-union occurred, one in each group. One infection and one deep vein thrombosis occurred in the Immediate group.

conclusionImmediate weight bearing after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy had no effect on functional scores at 1 year follow-up and did not significantly increase the complication rate. Immediate weight bearing after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy appears to be safe and can allow some patients a quicker return to activities of daily living and a decreased convalescence period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdultAgedBone PlatesBone TransplantationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeOsteotomyPain MeasurementRadiographyTibiaTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeHigh tibial osteotomyImmediate weight bearingKneeOpening wedgeOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.