Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27371185›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2016

Immediate total-body CT scanning versus conventional imaging and selective CT scanning in patients with severe trauma (REACT-2): a randomised controlled trial.

Joanne C Sierink, Kaij Treskes, Michael J R Edwards, Benn J A Beuker, Dennis den Hartog, Joachim Hohmann, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Jan S K Luitse, Ludo F M Beenen, Markus W Hollmann and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 113 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
37.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01523626 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Study of Early Assessment by CT Scanning in Trauma Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2011 to 2014Enrolled1,083ConditionsMultiple Trauma/InjuriesArmsTotal body Computed Tomography., Conventional imaging and selective CT scanning.
NCT04937868 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Developing a Decision Instrument to Guide Abdominal-pelvic CT Imaging of Blunt Trauma Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2018 to 2027Enrolled12,000ConditionsAbdominal Injury, Pelvic Fracture, Genital Hemorrhage, Lumbar Spine InjuryArmsThere are no interventions associated with this study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 290 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Imaging strategies for patients with multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Joanne C SierinkTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Kaij TreskesTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Michael J R EdwardsTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Benn J A BeukerTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Dennis den HartogTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Joachim HohmannDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Basel Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Marcel G W DijkgraafClinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jan S K LuitseTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ludo F M BeenenDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Markus W HollmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
J Carel GoslingsTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: j.c.goslings@amc.nl.
REACT-2 study group
Academic Medical Center · NLErasmus MC · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublished work suggests a survival benefit for patients with trauma who undergo total-body CT scanning during the initial trauma assessment; however, level 1 evidence is absent. We aimed to assess the effect of total-body CT scanning compared with the standard work-up on in-hospital mortality in patients with trauma.

methodsWe undertook an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial at four hospitals in the Netherlands and one in Switzerland. Patients aged 18 years or older with trauma with compromised vital parameters, clinical suspicion of life-threatening injuries, or severe injury were randomly assigned (1:1) by ALEA randomisation to immediate total-body CT scanning or to a standard work-up with conventional imaging supplemented with selective CT scanning. Neither doctors nor patients were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, analysed in the intention-to-treat population and in subgroups of patients with polytrauma and those with traumatic brain injury. The χ(2) test was used to assess differences in mortality. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01523626.

findingsBetween April 22, 2011, and Jan 1, 2014, 5475 patients were assessed for eligibility, 1403 of whom were randomly assigned: 702 to immediate total-body CT scanning and 701 to the standard work-up. 541 patients in the immediate total-body CT scanning group and 542 in the standard work-up group were included in the primary analysis. In-hospital mortality did not differ between groups (total-body CT 86 [16%] of 541 vs standard work-up 85 [16%] of 542; p=0.92). In-hospital mortality also did not differ between groups in subgroup analyses in patients with polytrauma (total-body CT 81 [22%] of 362 vs standard work-up 82 [25%] of 331; p=0.46) and traumatic brain injury (68 [38%] of 178 vs 66 [44%] of 151; p=0.31). Three serious adverse events were reported in patients in the total-body CT group (1%), one in the standard work-up group (<1%), and one in a patient who was excluded after random allocation. All five patients died.

interpretationDiagnosing patients with an immediate total-body CT scan does not reduce in-hospital mortality compared with the standard radiological work-up. Because of the increased radiation dose, future research should focus on the selection of patients who will benefit from immediate total-body CT.

fundingZonMw, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultBrain InjuriesFemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreInternational CooperationMaleMiddle AgedMultiple TraumaNetherlandsRadiation DosageSwitzerlandTime FactorsWhole Body Imaging

Identifiers

PMID27371185
OpenAlexW2474628096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.