Trial reportLancet (London, England)2016
Immediate total-body CT scanning versus conventional imaging and selective CT scanning in patients with severe trauma (REACT-2): a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 113 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Study of Early Assessment by CT Scanning in Trauma Patients
Developing a Decision Instrument to Guide Abdominal-pelvic CT Imaging of Blunt Trauma Patients
Who cites it
113 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 290 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Imaging strategies for patients with multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Pooled it
- Heterogeneity in defining multiple trauma: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Guideline
- Is it time to re-think FAST? A systematic review and meta-analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and conventional ultrasound for initial assessment of abdominal trauma.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Accuracy of Contrast Extravasation on Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Severe Pelvic Hemorrhage in Pelvic Trauma Patients: A Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Pooled it
- [The (severely) injured pregnant patient from the perspective of trauma surgery].Der Unfallchirurg · 2020Pooled it
- The influence of arm positions on abdominal image quality of whole-body computed tomography in trauma: systematic review.Emergency radiology · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Feasibility of a cluster randomised trial on the effect of trauma life support training: a pilot study in India.BMJ open · 2025Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of immediate total-body CT in patients with severe trauma (REACT-2 trial).The British journal of surgery · 2021Trial
- Refining the criteria for immediate total-body CT after severe trauma.European radiology · 2020Trial
- Implementation of new standard operating procedures for geriatric trauma patients with multiple injuries: a single level I trauma centre study.BMC geriatrics · 2019Trial
- Emergency Bleeding Control Interventions After Immediate Total-Body CT Scans in Trauma Patients.World journal of surgery · 2019Trial
- High rates of clinically relevant incidental findings by total-body CT scanning in trauma patients; results of the REACT-2 trial.European radiology · 2017Trial
- Utilization of whole-body computed tomography in trauma: The role of trauma center level and ACS verification.Surgery open science · 2026Article
- CT in adult patients with Polytrauma: current practices, protocol optimization, structured reporting and future directions.Emergency radiology · 2026Review
- Whole-Body Computed Tomography (WBCT) for the initial assessment of trauma patients: a retrospective observational study.Emergency radiology · 2026Observational
- Efficacy of pan-computed tomography scan in trauma patients presenting in the emergency department of a tertiary care center: an observational study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Dose-reduction strategies in whole-body CT for injured patients in the emergency department: a scoping review.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPublished work suggests a survival benefit for patients with trauma who undergo total-body CT scanning during the initial trauma assessment; however, level 1 evidence is absent. We aimed to assess the effect of total-body CT scanning compared with the standard work-up on in-hospital mortality in patients with trauma.
methodsWe undertook an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial at four hospitals in the Netherlands and one in Switzerland. Patients aged 18 years or older with trauma with compromised vital parameters, clinical suspicion of life-threatening injuries, or severe injury were randomly assigned (1:1) by ALEA randomisation to immediate total-body CT scanning or to a standard work-up with conventional imaging supplemented with selective CT scanning. Neither doctors nor patients were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, analysed in the intention-to-treat population and in subgroups of patients with polytrauma and those with traumatic brain injury. The χ(2) test was used to assess differences in mortality. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01523626.
findingsBetween April 22, 2011, and Jan 1, 2014, 5475 patients were assessed for eligibility, 1403 of whom were randomly assigned: 702 to immediate total-body CT scanning and 701 to the standard work-up. 541 patients in the immediate total-body CT scanning group and 542 in the standard work-up group were included in the primary analysis. In-hospital mortality did not differ between groups (total-body CT 86 [16%] of 541 vs standard work-up 85 [16%] of 542; p=0.92). In-hospital mortality also did not differ between groups in subgroup analyses in patients with polytrauma (total-body CT 81 [22%] of 362 vs standard work-up 82 [25%] of 331; p=0.46) and traumatic brain injury (68 [38%] of 178 vs 66 [44%] of 151; p=0.31). Three serious adverse events were reported in patients in the total-body CT group (1%), one in the standard work-up group (<1%), and one in a patient who was excluded after random allocation. All five patients died.
interpretationDiagnosing patients with an immediate total-body CT scan does not reduce in-hospital mortality compared with the standard radiological work-up. Because of the increased radiation dose, future research should focus on the selection of patients who will benefit from immediate total-body CT.
fundingZonMw, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.