Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27371159›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2016

Bystander Effect Induced by Electroporation is Possibly Mediated by Microvesicles and Dependent on Pulse Amplitude, Repetition Frequency and Cell Type.

Ajda Prevc, Apolonija Bedina Zavec, Maja Cemazar, Veronika Kloboves-Prevodnik, Monika Stimac, Vesna Todorovic, Primoz Strojan, Gregor Sersa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ajda PrevcDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska ulica 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Apolonija Bedina ZavecNational Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maja CemazarDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska ulica 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Veronika Kloboves-PrevodnikDepartment of Cytopathology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Monika StimacDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska ulica 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Vesna TodorovicDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska ulica 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Primoz StrojanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Gregor SersaDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska ulica 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. gsersa@onko-i.si.
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana · SINational Institute of Chemistry · SIUniversity of Primorska · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bystander effect, a known phenomenon in radiation biology, where irradiated cells release signals which cause damage to nearby, unirradiated cells, has not been explored in electroporated cells yet. Therefore, our aim was to determine whether bystander effect is present in electroporated melanoma cells in vitro, by determining viability of non-electroporated cells exposed to medium from electroporated cells and by the release of microvesicles as potential indicators of the bystander effect. Here, we demonstrated that electroporation of cells induces bystander effect: Cells exposed to electric pulses mediated their damage to the non-electroporated cells, thus decreasing cell viability. We have shown that shedding microvesicles may be one of the ways used by the cells to mediate the death signals to the neighboring cells. The murine melanoma B16F1 cell line was found to be more electrosensitive and thus more prone to bystander effect than the canine melanoma CMeC-1 cell line. In B16F1 cell line, bystander effect was present above the level of electropermeabilization of the cells, with the threshold at 800 V/cm. Furthermore, with increasing electric field intensities and the number of pulses, the bystander effect also increased. In conclusion, electroporation can induce bystander effect which may be mediated by microvesicles, and depends on pulse amplitude, repetition frequency and cell type.

Indexed as

Bystander EffectElectroporationAnimalsCell-Derived MicroparticlesCell Line, TumorCell Membrane PermeabilityCell SurvivalDogsMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceRadiation, IonizingBystander effectElectroporationIonizing radiationMedium transfer methodMelanoma cell linesMicrovesicles

Identifiers

PMID27371159
OpenAlexW2468856262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.