Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27370248›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2017

Peptide-drug conjugates as effective prodrug strategies for targeted delivery.

Yin Wang, Andrew G Cheetham, Garren Angacian, Hao Su, Lisi Xie, Honggang Cui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 190 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
190citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

190 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Peptide-Drug Conjugates: A New Hope for Cancer.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2025
    Review
  18. Peptide-Based Biomaterials as a Promising Tool for Cancer Radiotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

130 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yin WangDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Institute for NanoBioTechnology, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Andrew G CheethamDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Institute for NanoBioTechnology, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Garren AngacianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Hao SuDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Institute for NanoBioTechnology, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Lisi XieDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Institute for NanoBioTechnology, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Honggang CuiDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Institute for NanoBioTechnology, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Department of Oncology and Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Center for Nanomedicine, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 400 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.

Funding

T32: Predoctoral and Postdoctoral Training Program in Nanotechnology for Cancer ResearchT32CA153952 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Denis Wirtz · 2015 to 2026
$3.5M
T-32 NIH Postdoctoral Training Program in Nanotechnology for Cancer Medicine NTCMT32CA130840 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WIRTZ, DENIS · 2008 to 2012
$1.2M
Camptothecin Transformative Nanotubes as Effective Drug CarriersR21CA191740 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CUI, HONGGANG · 2015 to 2016
$377k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA191740NCI NIH HHS T32 CA130840NCI NIH HHS T32 CA153952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs) represent an important class of therapeutic agents that combine one or more drug molecules with a short peptide through a biodegradable linker. This prodrug strategy uniquely and specifically exploits the biological activities and self-assembling potential of small-molecule peptides to improve the treatment efficacy of medicinal compounds. We review here the recent progress in the design and synthesis of peptide-drug conjugates in the context of targeted drug delivery and cancer chemotherapy. We analyze carefully the key design features in choosing the peptide sequence and linker chemistry for the drug of interest, as well as the strategies to optimize the conjugate design. We highlight the recent progress in the design and synthesis of self-assembling peptide-drug amphiphiles to construct supramolecular nanomedicine and nanofiber hydrogels for both systemic and topical delivery of active pharmaceutical ingredients.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DesignHumansHydrogelsNanofibersNeoplasmsPeptidesProdrugsHydrogelsPeptidesProdrugsCancerConjugated chemistryDrug amphiphilesDrug deliveryPeptide–drug conjugates

Identifiers

PMID27370248
PMCPMC5199637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.