Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27368634›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2017

Backward-walking biological motion orients attention to moving away instead of moving toward.

Xiaowei Ding, Jun Yin, Rende Shui, Jifan Zhou, Mowei Shen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaowei DingDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Xixi Campus, Hangzhou, 310028, People's Republic of China.
Jun YinDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Xixi Campus, Hangzhou, 310028, People's Republic of China.
Rende ShuiDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Xixi Campus, Hangzhou, 310028, People's Republic of China.
Jifan ZhouDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Xixi Campus, Hangzhou, 310028, People's Republic of China. jifanzhou@zju.edu.cn.
Mowei ShenDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Xixi Campus, Hangzhou, 310028, People's Republic of China. mwshen@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Walking direction is an important attribute of biological motion because it carries key information, such as the specific intention of the walker. Although it is known that spatial attention is guided by walking direction, it remains unclear whether this attentional shift is reflexive (i.e., constantly shifts to the walking direction) or not. A richer interpretation of this effect is that attention is guided to seek the information that is necessary to understand the motion. To investigate this issue, we examined how backward-walking biological motion orients attention because the intention of walking backward is usually to avoid something that walking forward would encounter. The results showed that attention was oriented to the walking-away direction of biological motion instead of the walking-toward direction (Experiment 1), and this effect was not due to the gaze direction of biological motion (Experiment 2). Our findings suggest that the attentional shift triggered by walking direction is not reflexive, thus providing support for the rich interpretation of these attentional effects.

Indexed as

AttentionMotion PerceptionOrientationSpace PerceptionWalkingFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultBackward walkingBiological motionLean interpretationRich interpretationSpatial attention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.