Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27368632›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2017

Assessing the uniqueness of language: Animal grammatical abilities take center stage.

Carel Ten Cate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Long-distance dependencies in birdsong syntax.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Voice modulatory cues to structure across languages and species.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Neuronal Encoding in a High-Level Auditory Area: From Sequential Order of Elements to Grammatical Structure.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  9. Constraints on the lexicons of human languages have cognitive roots present in baboons (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Carel Ten CateBehavioural Biology, Institute of Biology Leiden and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9505, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands. c.j.ten.cate@biology.leidenuniv.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Questions related to the uniqueness of language can only be addressed properly by referring to sound knowledge of the relevant cognitive abilities of nonhuman animals. A key question concerns the nature and extent of animal rule-learning abilities. I discuss two approaches used to assess these abilities. One is comparing the structures of animal vocalizations to linguistic ones, and another is addressing the grammatical rule- and pattern-learning abilities of animals through experiments using artificial grammars. Neither of these approaches has so far provided unambiguous evidence of advanced animal abilities. However, when we consider how animal vocalizations are analyzed, the types of stimuli and tasks that are used in artificial grammar learning experiments, the limited number of species examined, and the groups to which these belong, I argue that the currently available evidence is insufficient to arrive at firm conclusions concerning the limitations of animal grammatical abilities. As a consequence, the gap between human linguistic rule-learning abilities and those of nonhuman animals may be smaller and less clear than is currently assumed. This means that it is still an open question whether a difference in the rule-learning and rule abstraction abilities between animals and humans played the key role in the evolution of language.

Indexed as

CognitionLanguageLearningVocalization, AnimalAnimalsHumansLinguisticsAnimal cognitionAnimal vocalizationsArtificial grammar learningComparative cognitionLanguage evolution

Identifiers

PMID27368632
PMCPMC5325849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.