Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27368418›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2017

A comparison of progestins within three classes: Differential effects on learning and memory in the aging surgically menopausal rat.

B Blair Braden, Madeline G Andrews, Jazmin I Acosta, Sarah E Mennenga, Courtney Lavery, Heather A Bimonte-Nelson

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Menopause, hormone therapy and cognition: maximizing translation from preclinical research.Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B Blair BradenDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States; Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium, United States.
Madeline G AndrewsDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Jazmin I AcostaDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Sarah E MennengaDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Courtney LaveryDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Heather A Bimonte-NelsonDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States; Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium, United States. Electronic address: bimonte.nelson@asu.edu.
Arizona State University · USAlzheimer's Association · US

Funding

Variations in Hormone Therapy: Effects on Cognition and Markers of Brain AgingR01AG028084 · NIA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BIMONTE-NELSON, HEATHER ALLYSON · 2007 to 2022
$4.7M
Graduate and Undergraduate Training in Biomedicine at ASUR25GM099650 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI NEWFELD, STUART J · 2012 to 2015
$2.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG028084NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM099650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFor decades, progestins have been included in hormone therapies (HT) prescribed to women to offset the risk of unopposed estrogen-induced endometrial hyperplasia. However, the potential effects on cognition of subcategories of clinically used progestins have been largely unexplored.

methodsIn two studies, the present investigation evaluated the cognitive effects of norethindrone acetate (NETA), levonorgestrel (LEVO), and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) on the water radial-arm maze (WRAM) and Morris water maze (MM) in middle-aged ovariectomized rats.

resultsIn Study 1, six-weeks of a high-dose NETA treatment impaired learning and delayed retention on the WRAM, and impaired reference memory on the MM. Low-dose NETA treatment impaired delayed retention on the WRAM. In Study 2, high-dose NETA treatment was reduced to four-weeks and compared to MPA and LEVO. As previously shown, MPA impaired working memory performance during the lattermost portion of testing, at the highest working memory load, impaired delayed retention on the WRAM, and impaired reference memory on the MM. NETA also impaired performance on these WRAM and MM measures. Interestingly, LEVO did not impair performance, but instead enhanced learning on the WRAM.

conclusionsThe current study corroborates previous evidence that the most commonly prescribed FDA-approved progestin for HT, MPA, impairs learning and memory in the ovariectomized middle-aged rat. When progestins from two different additional subcategories were investigated, NETA impaired learning and memory similarly to MPA, but LEVO enhanced learning. Future research is warranted to determine LEVO's potential as an ideal progestin for optimal health in women, including for cognition.

Indexed as

Estrogen Replacement TherapyAgingAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugLearningLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMemoryModels, AnimalNorethindroneNorethindrone AcetateOvariectomyProgestinsPsychological TestsRandom AllocationRats, Inbred F344LevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetateNorethindroneNorethindrone AcetateProgestinsAgingCognitionHormone therapyMemoryMenopauseProgestin

Identifiers

PMID27368418
PMCPMC5195920
OpenAlexW2467383487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.