Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27368167›Full record

ArticleBMC structural biology2016

Comparison of human and mouse E-selectin binding to Sialyl-Lewis(x).

Anne D Rocheleau, Thong M Cao, Tait Takitani, Michael R King

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC structural biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne D RocheleauMeinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Thong M CaoMeinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Tait TakitaniMeinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Michael R KingMeinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. mike.king@cornell.edu.
Cornell University · US

Funding

VASCULAR RELATIONS OF BLOOD CELLS AND PROTEINSP01HL018208 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WAUGH, RICHARD E · 1985 to 2014
$24.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL018208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring inflammation, leukocytes are captured by the selectin family of adhesion receptors lining blood vessels to facilitate exit from the bloodstream. E-selectin is upregulated on stimulated endothelial cells and binds to several ligands on the surface of leukocytes. Selectin:ligand interactions are mediated in part by the interaction between the lectin domain and Sialyl-Lewis x (sLe(x)), a tetrasaccharide common to selectin ligands. There is a high degree of homology between selectins of various species: about 72 and 60 % in the lectin and EGF domains, respectively. In this study, molecular dynamics, docking, and steered molecular dynamics simulations were used to compare the binding and dissociation mechanisms of sLe(x) with mouse and human E-selectin. First, a mouse E-selectin homology model was generated using the human E-selectin crystal structure as a template.

resultsMouse E-selectin was found to have a greater interdomain angle, which has been previously shown to correlate with stronger binding among selectins. sLe(x) was docked onto human and mouse E-selectin, and the mouse complex was found to have a higher free energy of binding and a lower dissociation constant, suggesting stronger binding. The mouse complex had higher flexibility in a few key residues. Finally, steered molecular dynamics was used to dissociate the complexes at force loading rates of 2000-5000 pm/ps(2). The mouse complex took longer to dissociate at every force loading rate and the difference was statistically significant at 3000 pm/ps(2). When sLe(x)-coated microspheres were perfused through microtubes coated with human or mouse E-selectin, the particles rolled more slowly on mouse E-selectin.

conclusionsBoth molecular dynamics simulations and microsphere adhesion experiments show that mouse E-selectin protein binds more strongly to sialyl Lewis x ligand than human E-selectin. This difference was explained by a greater interdomain angle for mouse E-selectin, and greater flexibility in key residues. Future work could introduce similar amino acid substitutions into the human E-selectin sequence to further modulate adhesion behavior.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBinding SitesE-SelectinHumansMiceMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMolecular Sequence DataOligosaccharidesSequence AlignmentSialyl Lewis X AntigenThermodynamicsE-SelectinOligosaccharidesSialyl Lewis X AntigenCell adhesionDockingE-selectinMolecular dynamicsReceptorSteered molecular dynamics

Identifiers

PMID27368167
PMCPMC4930595
OpenAlexW2469745025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.