Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27368057›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Comparison of High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate-to-Vigorous Continuous Training for Cardiometabolic Health and Exercise Enjoyment in Obese Young Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Zhaowei Kong, Xitao Fan, Shengyan Sun, Lili Song, Qingde Shi, Jinlei Nie

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04075799 (A HIIT to Improve Metabolic Health in Obese Adults With Insulin Resistance), which is not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
36.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04075799 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A HIIT to Improve Metabolic Health in Obese Adults With Insulin Resistance

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of New MexicoRan2022 to 2023Enrolled18ConditionsObesity, Insulin ResistanceArmshigh-intensity interval training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Rates of compliance and adherence to high-intensity interval training: a systematic review and Meta-analyses.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Pooled it
  8. Risk of bias and reporting practices in studies comparing VOJournal of sport and health science · 2022
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Short-Term (<8 wk) High-Intensity Interval Training in Diseased Cohorts.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2018
    Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhaowei KongFaculty of Education, University of Macau, Macao, China.
Xitao FanFaculty of Education, University of Macau, Macao, China.
Shengyan SunInstitute of Physical Education, Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Lili SongFaculty of Education, University of Macau, Macao, China.
Qingde ShiSchool of Physical Education and Sports, Macao Polytechnic Institute, Macao, China.
Jinlei NieSchool of Physical Education and Sports, Macao Polytechnic Institute, Macao, China.
University of Macau · MOMacao Polytechnic University · MOHuzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the effects of 5-week high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-to-vigorous intensity continuous training (MVCT) on cardiometabolic health outcomes and enjoyment of exercise in obese young women.

methodsA randomized controlled experiment was conducted that involved thirty-one obese females (age range of 18-30) randomly assigned to either HIIT or MVCT five-week training programs. Participants in HIIT condition performed 20 min of repeated 8 s cycling interspersed with 12 s rest intervals, and those in MVCT condition cycled continuously for 40 min at 60-80% of peak oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]O2peak), both for four days in a week. Outcomes such as [Formula: see text]O2peak, body composition estimated by bioimpedance analysis, blood lipids, and serum sexual hormones were measured at pre-and post-training. The scores of Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PAES) were collected during the intervention.

resultsAfter training, [Formula: see text]O2peak increased significantly for both training programs (9.1% in HIIT and 10.3% in MVCT) (p = 0.010, η2 = 0.41). Although MVCT group had a significant reduction in total body weight (TBW, -1.8%, p = 0.034), fat mass (FM, - 4.7%, p = 0.002) and percentage body fat (PBF, -2.9%, p = 0.016), there were no significant between-group differences in the change of the pre- and post-measures of these variables. The HIIT group had a higher score on PAES than the MVCT group during the intervention. For both conditions, exercise training led to a decline in resting testosterone and estradiol levels, but had no significant effect on blood lipids.

conclusionBoth HIIT and MVCT are effective in improving cardiorespiratory fitness and in reducing sexual hormones in obese young women; however, HIIT is a more enjoyable and time-efficient strategy. The mild-HIIT protocol seems to be useful for at least maintaining the body weight among sedentary individuals.

Indexed as

EmotionsOxygen ConsumptionAdolescentAdultBody CompositionBody WeightDietFemaleGonadal Steroid HormonesHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansLipidsMyocardiumObesityYoung AdultGonadal Steroid HormonesLipids

Identifiers

PMID27368057
PMCPMC4930190
OpenAlexW2471534553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.