Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27367928›Full record

ArticleThe FEBS journal2016

Protein folding on biosensor tips: folding of maltodextrin glucosidase monitored by its interactions with GroEL.

Ashutosh Pastor, Amit K Singh, Mark T Fisher, Tapan K Chaudhuri

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The FEBS journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Position-Dependent Effects of AP Sites Within anInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashutosh PastorKusuma School of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9866-6753
Amit K SinghKusuma School of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India.
Mark T FisherDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Centre, KS, USA.
Tapan K ChaudhuriKusuma School of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India.
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi · INUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

CryoEM analysis of Anthrax Toxin Pore ComplexesR01AI090085 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI FISHER, MARK T · 2011 to 2013
$948k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI090085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein folding has been extensively studied for the past six decades by employing solution-based methods such as solubility, enzymatic activity, secondary structure analysis, and analytical methods like FRET, NMR, and HD exchange. However, for rapid analysis of the folding process, solution-based approaches are often plagued with aggregation side reactions resulting in poor yields. In this work, we demonstrate that a bio-layer interferometry (BLI) chaperonin detection system can identify superior refolding conditions for denatured proteins. The degree of immobilized protein folding as a function of time can be detected by monitoring the binding of the high-affinity nucleotide-free form of the chaperonin GroEL. GroEL preferentially interacts with proteins that have hydrophobic surfaces exposed in their unfolded or partially folded form, so a decrease in GroEL binding can be correlated with burial of hydrophobic surfaces as folding progresses. The magnitude of GroEL binding to the protein immobilized on bio-layer interferometry biosensor inversely reflects the extent of protein folding and hydrophobic residue burial. We demonstrate conditions where accelerated folding can be observed for the aggregation-prone protein maltodextrin glucosidase (MalZ). Superior immobilized folding conditions identified on the bio-layer interferometry biosensor surface were reproduced on Ni-NTA sepharose bead surfaces and resulted in significant improvement in folding yields of released MalZ (measured by enzymatic activity) compared to bulk refolding conditions in solution.

Indexed as

Protein RefoldingBiosensing TechniquesChaperonin 60Glutamic AcidGlycoside HydrolasesImmobilized ProteinsInterferometryProtein ConformationSpectrometry, FluorescenceTemperatureChaperonin 60Glutamic AcidGlycoside HydrolasesImmobilized ProteinsBio-layer interferometryGroEL binding to monitor protein foldingimmobilized protein foldingprotein folding on biosensor tips

Identifiers

PMID27367928
PMCPMC4992417
OpenAlexW2461371760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.