Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27366987›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of internal medicine2016

Nonrandomized Intervention Study of Naloxone Coprescription for Primary Care Patients Receiving Long-Term Opioid Therapy for Pain.

Phillip O Coffin, Emily Behar, Christopher Rowe, Glenn-Milo Santos, Diana Coffa, Matthew Bald, Eric Vittinghoff

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
24.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 190 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Nudges for Naloxone in the Opioid Epidemic.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Pilot Assessment of Caregivers' and Patients' Perception of Naloxone Coprescribing in a Pediatric Sickle Cell Population.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
  16. Development of the barriers to opioid access scale among individuals with chronic pain.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The contribution of nonmedical opioid use to healthcare encounters for opioid overdose and use disorders among long-term users with metastatic cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Phillip O Coffin
Emily Behar
Christopher Rowe
Glenn-Milo Santos
Diana Coffa
Matthew Bald
Eric Vittinghoff
San Francisco Department of Public Health · US

Funding

Naloxone prescription for Opioid Safety Evaluation (NOSE)R21DA036776 · NIDA · PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES · PI COFFIN, PHILLIP O · 2013 to 2014
$304k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA036776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnintentional overdose involving opioid analgesics is a leading cause of injury-related death in the United States.

objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and effect of implementing naloxone prescription to patients prescribed opioids for chronic pain.

design2-year nonrandomized intervention study.

setting6 safety-net primary care clinics in San Francisco, California.

participants1985 adults receiving long-term opioid therapy for pain.

interventionProviders and clinic staff were trained and supported in naloxone prescribing. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes were proportion of patients prescribed naloxone, opioid-related emergency department (ED) visits, and prescribed opioid dose based on chart review.

results38.2% of 1985 patients receiving long-term opioids were prescribed naloxone. Patients prescribed higher doses of opioids and with an opioid-related ED visit in the past 12 months were independently more likely to be prescribed naloxone. Patients who received a naloxone prescription had 47% fewer opioid-related ED visits per month in the 6 months after receipt of the prescription (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.53 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.83]; P = 0.005) and 63% fewer visits after 1 year (IRR, 0.37 [CI, 0.22 to 0.64]; P < 0.001) compared with patients who did not receive naloxone. There was no net change over time in opioid dose among those who received naloxone and those who did not (IRR, 1.03 [CI, 0.91 to 1.27]; P = 0.61). LIMITATION: Results are observational and may not be generalizable beyond safety-net settings.

conclusionNaloxone can be coprescribed to primary care patients prescribed opioids for pain. When advised to offer naloxone to all patients receiving opioids, providers may prioritize those with established risk factors. Providing naloxone in primary care settings may have ancillary benefits, such as reducing opioid-related adverse events. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAdultAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainDrug OverdoseEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsSan FranciscoAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID27366987
PMCPMC5783639
OpenAlexW2475071433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.