Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27366698›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of ophthalmology2016

Ophthalmology simulation for undergraduate and postgraduate clinical education.

Daniel Shu Wei Ting, Shaun Sebastian Khung Peng Sim, Christine Wen Leng Yau, Mohamad Rosman, Ai Tee Aw, Ian Yew San Yeo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Application of a 3D-printed eye model for teaching direct ophthalmoscopy to undergraduates.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [Evaluation of a virtual reality simulator for learning direct ophthalmoscopy in student teaching].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel Shu Wei TingThird Hospital Avenue, Singapore National Eye Centre, 168751, Singapore; College Road, DUKE-NUS Medical School Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Shaun Sebastian Khung Peng SimThird Hospital Avenue, Singapore National Eye Centre, 168751, Singapore.
Christine Wen Leng YauThird Hospital Avenue, Singapore National Eye Centre, 168751, Singapore.
Mohamad RosmanThird Hospital Avenue, Singapore National Eye Centre, 168751, Singapore; College Road, DUKE-NUS Medical School Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Ai Tee AwThird Hospital Avenue, Singapore National Eye Centre, 168751, Singapore.
Ian Yew San YeoThird Hospital Avenue, Singapore National Eye Centre, 168751, Singapore; College Road, DUKE-NUS Medical School Singapore, 169857, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a review education paper on the current ophthalmology simulators utilized worldwide for undergraduate and postgraduate training. At present, various simulators such as the EYE Exam Simulator (Kyoto Kagaku Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan), Eyesi direct ophthalmoscope simulator (VRmagic, GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), Eyesi indirect ophthalmoscope simulator (VRmagic, GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) and Eyesi cataract simulators (VRmagic, GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). These simulators are thought to be able to reduce the initial learning curve for the ophthalmology training but further research will need to be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the simulation-assisted Ophthalmology training. Future research will be of great value to assess the medical students and residents' responses and performance regarding the usefulness of the individual eye simulator.

Indexed as

cataract simulatordirect ophthalmoscopy simulatorophthalmology residency trainingophthalmology simulator

Identifiers

PMID27366698
PMCPMC4916153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.