Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27366697›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of ophthalmology2016

The transcorneal electrical stimulation as a novel therapeutic strategy against retinal and optic neuropathy: a review of experimental and clinical trials.

Ye Tao, Tao Chen, Bei Liu, Li-Qiang Wang, Guang-Hua Peng, Li-Min Qin, Zhong-Jun Yan, Yi-Fei Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Review of Current Management Practices.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Use of Electrotherapeutics in Ophthalmology.American journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ye TaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology & Visual Science Key Lab of PLA, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.
Tao ChenDepartment of Clinical Aerospace Medicine, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
Bei LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery and Institute for Functional Brain Disorders, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi Province, China.
Li-Qiang WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology & Visual Science Key Lab of PLA, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.
Guang-Hua PengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology & Visual Science Key Lab of PLA, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.
Li-Min QinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology & Visual Science Key Lab of PLA, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.
Zhong-Jun YanDepartment of Neurosurgery and Institute for Functional Brain Disorders, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi Province, China.
Yi-Fei HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology & Visual Science Key Lab of PLA, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) is a novel therapeutic approach to activate the retina and related downstream structures. TES has multiple advantages over traditional treatments, such as being minimally invasive and readily applicable in a routine manner. Series of animal experiments have shown that TES protects the retinal neuron from traumatic or genetic induced degeneration. These laboratory evidences support its utilization in ophthalmological therapies against various retinal and optical diseases including retinitis pigmentosa (RP), traumatic optic neuropathy, anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION), and retinal artery occlusions (RAOs). Several pioneering explorations sought to clarify the functional mechanism underlying the neuroprotective effects of TES. It seems that the neuroprotective effects should not be attributed to a solitary pathway, on the contrary, multiple mechanisms might contribute collectively to maintain cellular homeostasis and promote cell survival in the retina. More precise evaluations via functional and morphological techniques would determine the exact mechanism underlying the remarkable neuroprotective effect of TES. Further studies to determine the optimal parameters and the long-term stability of TES are crucial to justify the clinical significance and to establish TES as a popularized therapeutic modality against retinal and optic neuropathy.

Indexed as

optic neuropathyretinal diseasetherapeutic strategytranscorneal electrical stimulation

Identifiers

PMID27366697
PMCPMC4916152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.