Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27366696›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of ophthalmology2016

Characteristics of corneal dystrophies: a review from clinical, histological and genetic perspectives.

Ze-Nan Lin, Jie Chen, Hong-Ping Cui

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Posterior Polymorphous Corneal Dystrophy in a Patient with a NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analysis ofJournal of ophthalmology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ze-Nan LinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China.
Jie ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China.
Hong-Ping CuiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China.
Shanghai East Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal dystrophy is a common type of hereditary corneal diseases. It includes many types, which have varied pathology, histology and clinical manifestations. Recently, the examination techniques of ophthalmology and gene sequencing advance greatly, which do benefit to our understanding of these diseases. However, many aspects remain still unknown. And due to the poor knowledge of these diseases, the results of the treatments are not satisfoctory. The purpose of this review was to summarize the clinical, histological and genetic characteristics of different types of corneal dystrophies.

Indexed as

cliniccorneal dystrophygene mutationhistology

Identifiers

PMID27366696
PMCPMC4916151
OpenAlexW2500458357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.