Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27366640›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2016

The in vitro and in vivo effects of constitutive light expression on a bioluminescent strain of the mouse enteropathogen Citrobacter rodentium.

Hannah M Read, Grant Mills, Sarah Johnson, Peter Tsai, James Dalton, Lars Barquist, Cristin G Print, Wayne M Patrick, Siouxsie Wiles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hannah M ReadBioluminescent Superbugs Lab, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Grant MillsBioluminescent Superbugs Lab, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sarah JohnsonBioluminescent Superbugs Lab, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Peter TsaiDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Bioinformatics Institute, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
James DaltonBioluminescent Superbugs Lab, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, New Zealand.
Lars BarquistInstitute for Molecular Infection Biology, University of Würzburg , Würzburg , Germany.
Cristin G PrintDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Bioinformatics Institute, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, New Zealand.
Wayne M PatrickMaurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, New Zealand; Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Siouxsie WilesBioluminescent Superbugs Lab, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioluminescent reporter genes, such as those from fireflies and bacteria, let researchers use light production as a non-invasive and non-destructive surrogate measure of microbial numbers in a wide variety of environments. As bioluminescence needs microbial metabolites, tagging microorganisms with luciferases means only live metabolically active cells are detected. Despite the wide use of bioluminescent reporter genes, very little is known about the impact of continuous (also called constitutive) light expression on tagged bacteria. We have previously made a bioluminescent strain of Citrobacter rodentium, a bacterium which infects laboratory mice in a similar way to how enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) infect humans. In this study, we compared the growth of the bioluminescent C. rodentium strain ICC180 with its non-bioluminescent parent (strain ICC169) in a wide variety of environments. To understand more about the metabolic burden of expressing light, we also compared the growth profiles of the two strains under approximately 2,000 different conditions. We found that constitutive light expression in ICC180 was near-neutral in almost every non-toxic environment tested. However, we also found that the non-bioluminescent parent strain has a competitive advantage over ICC180 during infection of adult mice, although this was not enough for ICC180 to be completely outcompeted. In conclusion, our data suggest that constitutive light expression is not metabolically costly to C. rodentium and supports the view that bioluminescent versions of microbes can be used as a substitute for their non-bioluminescent parents to study bacterial behaviour in a wide variety of environments.

Indexed as

Animal modelBiologBioluminescenceBioluminescence imagingBiophotonic imagingEnteric pathogensLuciferaseLuxPhenotypic microarrayReporter genes

Identifiers

PMID27366640
PMCPMC4924136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.