Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27366370›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2013

Can we Improve Outcome in High Risk Surgery?

Andras Mikor, Zsolt Molnar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andras MikorUniversity of Szeged, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Szeged, Hungary.
Zsolt MolnarUniversity of Szeged, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Szeged, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the small number of high-risk surgical patients in comparison to all surgical patients, they account for the largest proportion of overall perioperative mortality. Goal directed hemodynamic support may result in a lower incidence of complications and reduced length of hospital stay in these patients. Beyond the standard monitoring of circulation, such as blood pressure and heart rate, further parameters and procedures such as pulse pressure/stroke volume variation-, stroke volume/cardiac index-, and central venous oxygen saturation-guided resuscitation may improve the outcome of high-risk surgical patients. The aim of this review is to focus on the results of animal and clinical studies investigating the usefulness of these indices in the context of goal-directed perioperative support.

Indexed as

central venous oxygen saturationgoal directed therapyHigh-risk surgeryimproved outcomepulse pressure variationstroke volume

Identifiers

PMID27366370
PMCPMC4894207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.