Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27366345›Full record

ArticleJournal of intercultural ethnopharmacology

In vitro antimicrobial activity of five essential oils on multidrug resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates.

Hercules Sakkas, Panagiota Gousia, Vangelis Economou, Vassilios Sakkas, Stefanos Petsios, Chrissanthy Papadopoulou

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intercultural ethnopharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessing Contact Time and Concentration ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. A New Lavender (Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Microbiological Quality of Deer Meat Treated with Essential OilAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  12. Antitumor Effect ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Review of the Phytochemistry and Antimicrobial Properties ofIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Essential Oils with High Activity against Stationary PhaseAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hercules SakkasDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Panagiota GousiaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Vangelis EconomouDepartment of Hygiene and Technology of Food of Animal Origin, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Vassilios SakkasDepartment of Chemistry, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, School of Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Stefanos PetsiosDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Chrissanthy PapadopoulouDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
University of Ioannina · GRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Analytical Chemistry · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIM/

backgroundThe emergence of drug-resistant pathogens has drawn attention on medicinal plants for potential antimicrobial properties. The objective of the present study was the investigation of the antimicrobial activity of five plant essential oils on multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. MATERIALS AND

methodsBasil, chamomile blue, origanum, thyme, and tea tree oil were tested against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 6), Escherichia coli (n = 4), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 7), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 5) using the broth macrodilution method.

resultsThe tested essential oils produced variable antibacterial effect, while Chamomile blue oil demonstrated no antibacterial activity. Origanum, Thyme, and Basil oils were ineffective on P. aeruginosa isolates. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration values ranged from 0.12% to 1.50% (v/v) for tea tree oil, 0.25-4% (v/v) for origanum and thyme oil, 0.50% to >4% for basil oil and >4% for chamomile blue oil. Compared to literature data on reference strains, the reported MIC values were different by 2SD, denoting less successful antimicrobial activity against multidrug resistant isolates.

conclusionsThe antimicrobial activities of the essential oils are influenced by the strain origin (wild, reference, drug sensitive, or resistant) and it should be taken into consideration whenever investigating the plants' potential for developing new antimicrobials.

Indexed as

Acinetobacterantimicrobial activityEscherichia coliessential oilKlebsiellamultidrug resistantPseudomonas

Identifiers

PMID27366345
PMCPMC4927124
OpenAlexW2338905031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.