Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27366245›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of neurosurgery

A novel equine-derived pericardium membrane for dural repair: A preliminary, short-term investigation.

Roberto Centonze, Emiliano Agostini, Samantha Massaccesi, Stefano Toninelli, Letterio Morabito

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of neurosurgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Clinical management of dural defects: A review.World journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Structure and mechanical characteristics of spinal dura mater in different segments of sheep's spine].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2019
    Article
  6. Equine pericardium for tectonic globe repair.International ophthalmology · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberto CentonzeDivision of Neurosurgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro, Italy.
Emiliano AgostiniDivision of Neurosurgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro, Italy.
Samantha MassaccesiDivision of Neurosurgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro, Italy.
Stefano ToninelliDivision of Neurosurgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro, Italy.
Letterio MorabitoDivision of Neurosurgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro, Italy.
Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA large variety of biological and artificial materials are employed in dural repair, each of them with major limitations. Autologous grafts have limited availability and require an additional incision and surgical time. Cadaveric preparations and heterologous materials entail the risk of iatrogenic transmission of prions, whereas synthetic substitutes have been reported to cause inflammatory reactions and graft rejection. An equine-derived pericardium membrane has been developed (Heart(®), Bioteck, Vicenza, Italy) with mechanical and safety-related features that could make it suitable for neurosurgical application.

aimsThis preliminary study aimed to evaluate the short-term safety and efficacy of the Heart(®) membrane in dural repair procedures following meningioma surgeries. SUBJECTS AND

methodsMedical records of patients who were surgically treated for an intracranial meningioma and underwent duraplasty with the Heart(®) membrane were reviewed retrospectively. The occurrence of any graft-related complications such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, postoperative hematoma, wound infection, meningitis, and neurological symptoms was analyzed.

resultsEight patients were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. A watertight closure was achieved in all of them. Postoperatively, no patients exhibited CSF leak, cerebral contusion, hemorrhage, or wound infection. The 1-month radiological follow-up revealed no evidence of pseudomeningocele, wound breakdown, or meningitis. Neurologic complications were observed in three patients but not directly imputable to the dural substitute or its application.

conclusionsIn all the patients, the pericardium membrane enabled achievement of a watertight dural closure without graft-related adverse events. Further investigations should be performed to assess medium- and long-term clinical outcomes in a larger set of patients.

Indexed as

Dural substituteduraplastyequine pericardiumxenograft

Identifiers

PMID27366245
PMCPMC4849287
OpenAlexW2327276407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.