Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27366034›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology

Impact of glycemic control on colonoscopy outcomes: bowel preparation and polyp detection.

Manhal Izzy, Kinesh Changela, Dhuha Alhankawi, Nami Safai Haeri, Sulay Shah, Ghalib Jibara, Sury Anand, Shashideep Singhal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Impact of opioid use on patients undergoing screening colonoscopy according to the quality of bowel preparation.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Manhal IzzyDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (Manhal Izzy); Division of Gastroenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY (Manhal Izzy, Kinesh Changela, Dhuha Alhankawi, Nami Safai Haeri, Sury Anand).
Kinesh ChangelaDivision of Gastroenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY (Manhal Izzy, Kinesh Changela, Dhuha Alhankawi, Nami Safai Haeri, Sury Anand).
Dhuha AlhankawiDivision of Gastroenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY (Manhal Izzy, Kinesh Changela, Dhuha Alhankawi, Nami Safai Haeri, Sury Anand).
Nami Safai HaeriDivision of Gastroenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY (Manhal Izzy, Kinesh Changela, Dhuha Alhankawi, Nami Safai Haeri, Sury Anand).
Sulay ShahHospitalist Program, Atlanticare Regional Medical Center, Atlantic City, NJ (Sulay Shah).
Ghalib JibaraUrology, The Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY (Ghalib Jibara).
Sury AnandDivision of Gastroenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY (Manhal Izzy, Kinesh Changela, Dhuha Alhankawi, Nami Safai Haeri, Sury Anand).
Shashideep SinghalUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Shashideep Singhal), USA.
Brooklyn Hospital Center · USAtlantiCare · USBrookdale University Hospital and Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe negative effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the colonoscopy preparation has been previously established. Metabolic syndrome has been shown to increase risk for malignancy and possibly for premalignant lesions. This study aimed to investigate the impact of DM control on colonoscopy outcomes including bowel preparation and adenoma detection rate (ADR).

methodsWe included patients with DM who underwent colonoscopy in our hospital and had a documented glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) within 3 months. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their HbA1C level. The clinical and endoscopic data were collected and analyzed.

resultsOur cohort included 352 DM patients. The mean age was 63.5 years. When patients were analyzed based on HBA1C, bowel preparation was poor in 46.7% of patients with good glycemic control, 52.1% of patients with fair control and 50% of patients with poor control. ADR was 24.3% in patients with good glycemic control, 20.2% in patients with fair glycemic control and 27.1% in patients with poor glycemic control. There was no statistically significant difference in the quality of preparation or adenoma detection amongst the groups.

conclusionThe degree of glycemic control did not impact the quality of bowel preparation or ADR.

Indexed as

Adenoma detection ratebowel preparationcolonoscopydiabetes mellitusglycosylated hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID27366034
PMCPMC4923819
OpenAlexW2463043287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.