Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27365760›Full record

ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2011

A Study of the Newer Prognostic Markers in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphomas.

Kavita Sahai, Vandana Gangadharan, H P Singh, N S Mani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kavita SahaiSenior Advisor (Pathology), Base Hospital, Delhi Cantt-10.
Vandana GangadharanPathologist, Holovision Diagnostics, Port Blair.
H P SinghSenior Advisor (Medicine & Medical Oncology), Command Hospital (CC), Lucknow.
N S ManiCommandant, MH, Jaipur.
Command Hospital · INHospital Base · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCL) encompass a pathogenetically heterogeneous group of aggressive tumours that are rapidly fatal if untreated. Gene expression profiling studies have identified distinct molecular subtypes of DLBCL, one with an expression profile similar to normal germinal centre B cells (GCB subtype) and a second mimicking activated peripheral blood B cells (ABC subtype) having different prognostic significance allowing risk stratification of lymphoma patients and development of specific therapeutic strategies.

methodsTwenty cases of DLBCL were included in the study and categorized into germinal centre and non germinal centre subtypes using the following antibody panel. CD10, Bcl-6, MUM1 and CD138. The germinal centre and non germinal centre subtypes were defined as under Germinal centre (DLBCL) CD10 + and/or Bcl-6 +, MUM1 -, CD138 - and Non germinal centre (DLBCL) CD10, Bcl-6 ±, MUM1 ±, CD138 ±.

resultIn our study of twenty cases thirteen were germinal centre DLBCL while seven of the twenty cases were non germinal centre type of DLBCL. 75% of the nodal cases and 62.5% of extra nodal cases were germinal centre B cell type. Overall survival in the GCB and non GCB groups was 91% and 14% respectively and the difference was highly significant statistically.

conclusionThis study validates the existence of prognostic subgroups of DLBCL in the Indian population.

Indexed as

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)Germinal centre B subtypeImmunohistochemical subtypesNon germinal centre subtypePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID27365760
PMCPMC4920616
OpenAlexW1972876367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.