Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27365551›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of medical sciences2016

Macrophage Immune Response Suppression by Recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Antigens, the ESAT-6, CFP-10, and ESAT-6/CFP-10 Fusion Proteins.

Atefeh Seghatoleslam, Mina Hemmati, Saeedeh Ebadat, Bahram Movahedi, Zohreh Mostafavi-Pour

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of medical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Diagnostics of tuberculosis and differentiation of nonspecific tuberculin reactions in animals.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Atefeh SeghatoleslamRecombinant Protein Laboratory, Biochemistry Department, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Histomorphometry and Stereology Research Center, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mina HemmatiRecombinant Protein Laboratory, Biochemistry Department, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Saeedeh EbadatRecombinant Protein Laboratory, Biochemistry Department, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Bahram MovahediRecombinant Protein Laboratory, Biochemistry Department, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Zohreh Mostafavi-PourRecombinant Protein Laboratory, Biochemistry Department, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Maternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMacrophage immune responses are affected by the secretory proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). This study aimed to examine the immune responses of macrophages to Mtb secretory antigens, namely ESAT-6, CFP-10, and ESAT-6/CFP-10.

methodsTHP-1 cells (a human monocytic cell line) were cultured and differentiated to macrophages by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. The cytotoxicity of the recombinant Mtb proteins was assessed using the MTT assay. Two important immune responses of macrophages, namely NO and ROS production, were measured in response to the ESAT-6, CFP-10, and ESAT-6/CFP-10 antigens. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with SPSS, version 16, and considered significant at P<0.05.

resultsThe results showed that the ESAT-6, CFP-10, and ESAT-6/CFP-10 proteins markedly reduced macrophage immune response. The treatment of the THP-1-differentiated cells with ESAT-6, CFP-10, and ESAT-6/CFP-10 reduced NO and ROS production. The treated THP-1-differentiated cells exhibited less inducible NO synthase activity than did the untreated cells. No toxic effect on macrophage viability was observed for the applied proteins at the different concentrations.

conclusionIt seems that the decline in macrophage immune response is due to the suppression of NO and ROS production pathways without any effect on cell viability.

Indexed as

CFP-10 proteinESAT-6 proteinMycobacterium TuberculosisReactive Oxygen SpeciesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27365551
PMCPMC4912648
OpenAlexW2425796450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.