Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27365091›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2016

Clinical and economic impact of pharmacists' intervention in a large volume chemotherapy preparation unit.

Ji-Min Han, Young-Mi Ah, Sung Yun Suh, Sun-Hoi Jung, Hyeon Joo Hahn, Seock-Ah Im, Ju-Yeun Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Use of failure mode and effects analysis for risk analysis of investigational drug products management in clinical trials.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role of the pharmacist in reducing healthcare costs: current insights.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ji-Min HanDepartment of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Young-Mi AhCollege of Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Sung Yun SuhDepartment of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Sun-Hoi JungDepartment of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyeon Joo HahnDepartment of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Seock-Ah ImDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ju-Yeun LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea. jypharm@hanyang.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Even though pharmacists have devoted considerable time to ensuring patient safety during the process of preparing and dispensing chemotherapy, only a few studies have evaluated their efforts. Objective To evaluate the clinical and economic impact of pharmacists' interventions in a large volume chemotherapy preparation unit. Setting A 1600-bed tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea. Method Pharmacist intervention records from May 2012 to April 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical significance of interventions was rated by one physician and one pharmacist. A cost-benefit analysis was conducted. The benefit from interventions was estimated through both cost avoidance based on the potential to avoid an adverse drug event (ADE) and cost savings related to reducing discarded products. Cost was estimated from the pharmacists' salary corresponding to the time spent in reviewing chemotherapy prescriptions. Main outcome measure Acceptance rate, clinical significance, net cost-benefit, and cost-benefit ratio of pharmacist interventions. Results Among 39,649 cancer chemotherapy prescriptions in 6364 patients, 631 interventions were performed for 435 patients. The acceptance rate was 72.1 %. Most cases of declined interventions were related to dosage adjustment within the range of <10 % of the prescribed dosage. More than half of the interventions were considered as clinically more than "significant" (50.4 %). The cost-benefit analysis showed a clear cost benefit with a net cost-benefit of $116,493 and a cost-benefit ratio of 3.64:1. Conclusion Pharmacists' interventions in a large volume ambulatory-based chemotherapy preparation unit provided a positive economic impact on health care budget and were effective in preventing clinically significant ADEs.

Indexed as

Professional RoleAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmacistsPharmacy Service, HospitalRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsChemotherapyCompoundingCost-benefitKoreaPharmacist intervention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.