ReviewEssays in biochemistry2016
Acoustic biosensors.
Review in Essays in biochemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Fixed-Frequency to Tunable: Advances in Acoustic Sensors for Physiological Acoustic Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Acoustic Bioprinting: A Glimpse Into an Emerging Field.Small methods · 2026Review
- Innovations in Biosensing Technologies for Cancer Diagnosis and Theranostics.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Biosensor technologies in cancer: tools for early detection and prognostic monitoring.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- Biosensors, Artificial Intelligence Biosensors, False Results and Novel Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Principles and Biomedical Applications of Self-Assembled Peptides: Potential Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Point-of-Care Biosensing: Challenges and Opportunities.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Recent Development of Acoustic Sensors as Effective Chemical Detecting Tools for Biological Cells and Their Bioactivities.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Analysis of Acousto-Optic Phenomenon in SAW Acoustofluidic Chip and Its Application in Light Refocusing.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Biomechanical Sensing Using Gas Bubbles Oscillations in Liquids and Adjacent Technologies: Theory and Practical Applications.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Emerging Technologies for Detecting the Chemical Composition of Plant and Animal Tissues and Their Bioactivities: An Editorial.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Microalgae Bioactive Carbohydrates as a Novel Sustainable and Eco-Friendly Source of Prebiotics: Emerging Health Functionality and Recent Technologies for Extraction and Detection.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Review
- Acoustic Biosensors and Microfluidic Devices in the Decennium: Principles and Applications.Micromachines · 2021Review
- A Comparison of EIS and QCM NanoMIP-Based Sensors for Morphine.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Recent advances in biosensing approaches for point-of-care breast cancer diagnostics: challenges and future prospects.Nanoscale advances · 2021Review
- Recent innovations of ultrasound green technology in herbal phytochemistry: A review.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2021Review
- A Review on Biosensors and Recent Development of Nanostructured Materials-Enabled Biosensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Design Strategies for Electrochemical Aptasensors for Cancer Diagnostic Devices.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Biosensors for Point Mutation Detection.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- MIPs for commercial application in low-cost sensors and assays - An overview of the current status quo.Sensors and actuators. B, Chemical · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resonant and acoustic wave devices have been researched for several decades for application in the gravimetric sensing of a variety of biological and chemical analytes. These devices operate by coupling the measurand (e.g. analyte adsorption) as a modulation in the physical properties of the acoustic wave (e.g. resonant frequency, acoustic velocity, dissipation) that can then be correlated with the amount of adsorbed analyte. These devices can also be miniaturized with advantages in terms of cost, size and scalability, as well as potential additional features including integration with microfluidics and electronics, scaled sensitivities associated with smaller dimensions and higher operational frequencies, the ability to multiplex detection across arrays of hundreds of devices embedded in a single chip, increased throughput and the ability to interrogate a wider range of modes including within the same device. Additionally, device fabrication is often compatible with semiconductor volume batch manufacturing techniques enabling cost scalability and a high degree of precision and reproducibility in the manufacturing process. Integration with microfluidics handling also enables suitable sample pre-processing/separation/purification/amplification steps that could improve selectivity and the overall signal-to-noise ratio. Three device types are reviewed here: (i) bulk acoustic wave sensors, (ii) surface acoustic wave sensors, and (iii) micro/nano-electromechanical system (MEMS/NEMS) sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.