ReviewJournal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry2016
Protein effects in non-heme iron enzyme catalysis: insights from multiscale models.
Review in Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spectroscopic and computational studies of a bifunctional iron- and 2-oxoglutarate dependent enzyme, AsqJ.Methods in enzymology · 2024Article
- Fabrication of P and N Co-Doped Carbon Dots for FeBiosensors · 2023Article
- Second Coordination Sphere Effects on the Mechanistic Pathways for Dioxygen Activation by a Ferritin: Involvement of a Tyr Radical and the Identification of a Cation Binding Site.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many non-heme iron enzymes have similar sets of ligands but still catalyze widely different reactions. A key question is, therefore, the role of the protein in controlling reactivity and selectivity. Examples from multiscale simulations, primarily QM/MM, of both mono- and binuclear non-heme iron enzymes are used to analyze the stability of these models and what they reveal about the protein effects. Consistent results from QM/MM modeling are the importance of the hydrogen bond network to control reactivity and electrostatic stabilization of electron transfer from second-sphere residues. The long-range electrostatic effects on reaction barriers are small for many systems. In the systems where large electrostatic effects have been reported, these lead to higher barriers. There is thus no evidence of any significant long-range electrostatic effects contributing to the catalytic efficiency of non-heme iron enzymes. However, the correct evaluation of electrostatic contributions is challenging, and the correlation between calculated residue contributions and the effects of mutation experiments is not very strong. The largest benefits of QM/MM models are thus the improved active-site geometries, rather than the calculation of accurate energies. Reported differences in mechanistic predictions between QM and QM/MM models can be explained by differences in hydrogen bonding patterns in and around the active site. Correctly constructed cluster models can give results with similar accuracy as those from multiscale models, but the latter reduces the risk of drawing the wrong mechanistic conclusions based on incorrect geometries and are preferable for all types of modeling, even when using very large QM parts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27364958What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.