SynthesisScientific reports2016
Postoperative autotransfusion drain after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The efficacy and safety of autologous blood transfusion drainage in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2016Pooled it
- Optimal 6-hour window for salvaged mediastinal blood retransfusion after cardiovascular surgery: an in vitro quality and safety analysis.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangueTrial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of a postoperative autotransfusion drain (PATD) to reduce allogenic blood transfusions in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Thirteen RCTs (1,424 participants) were included in our meta-analysis. The results showed that PATD reduced the rate of allogenic transfusions (RR = 0.56; 95% CI [0.40, 0.77]) and total blood loss (MD = -196.04; 95% CI [-311.01, -81.07]). Haemoglobin (Hb) levels were higher in the PATD group on postoperative day 1 (MD = 0.28; 95% CI [0.06, 0.49]), but no significant differences on postoperative days 2 or 3 (MD = 0.29; 95% CI [-0.02, 0.60]; MD = 0.26; 95% CI [-0.04, 0.56]; respectively). There were no differences in length of hospital stay (MD = -0.18; 95% CI [-0.61, 0.25]), febrile reaction (RR = 1.26; 95% CI [0.95, 1.67]), infection (RR = 0.95; 95% CI [0.54, 1.65]), wound problems (RR = 1.07; 95% CI [0.87, 1.33]), or serious adverse events (RR = 0.59; 95% CI [0.10, 3.58]). Our findings suggest that PATD is effective in reducing the rate of allogenic transfusion. However, the included studies are inadequately powered to conclusively determine the safety of this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.