Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27364834›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2016

Receipt of Cancer Screening Is a Predictor of Life Expectancy.

James S Goodwin, Kristin Sheffield, Shuang Li, Alai Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Use of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography in the Medicare Population.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cultural Influences on Primary Care Delivery.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James S GoodwinDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. jsgoodwi@utmb.edu.
Kristin SheffieldInstitute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Shuang LiSealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555-0177, USA.
Alai TanDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Funding

UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001439 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI URBAN, RANDALL J · 2015 to 2024
$40.0M
UTMB OAIC Research Education Component (REC)P30AG024832 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI JAMES S. GOODWIN, MD, MELISSA M. MORROW · 2005 to 2026
$26.7M
Patient Centered Outcomes Research in the ElderlyR24HS022134 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GOODWIN, MD, JAMES S. · 2013 to 2017
$4.8M
Established Investigator Award in Cancer Prevention & ControlK05CA134923 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GOODWIN, MD, JAMES S. · 2008 to 2019
$1.0M
AHRQ HHS R24 HS022134NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001439NCI NIH HHS K05 CA134923NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObtaining cancer screening on patients with limited life expectancy has been proposed as a measure for low quality care for primary care physicians (PCPs). However, administrative data may underestimate life expectancy in patients who undergo screening.

objectiveTo determine the association between receipt of screening mammography or PSA and overall survival.

designRetrospective cohort study from 1/1/1999 to 12/31/2012. Receipt of screening was assessed for 2001-2002 and survival from 1/1/2003 to 12/31/2012. Life expectancy was estimated as of 1/1/03 using a validated algorithm, and was compared to actual survival for men and women, stratified by receipt of cancer screening.

participantsA 5 % sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged 69-90 years as of 1/1/2003 (n = 906,723).

interventionsReceipt of screening mammography in 2001-2002 for women, or a screening PSA test in 2002 for men. MAIN MEASURES: Survival from 1/1/2003 through 12/31/2012. KEY

resultsSubjects were stratified by life expectancy based on age and comorbidity. Within each stratum, the subjects with prior cancer screening had actual median survivals higher than those who were not screened, with differences ranging from 1.7 to 2.1 years for women and 0.9 to 1.1 years for men. In a Cox model, non-receipt of screening in women had an impact on survival (HR = 1.52; 95 % CI = 1.51, 1.54) similar in magnitude to a diagnosis of complicated diabetes or heart failure, and was comparable to uncomplicated diabetes or liver disease in men (HR = 1.23; 1.22, 1.25).

conclusionsReceipt of cancer screening is a powerful marker of health status that is not captured by comorbidity measures in administrative data. Because life expectancy algorithms using administrative data underestimate the life expectancy of patients who undergo screening, they can overestimate the problem of cancer screening in patients with limited life expectancy.

Indexed as

KallikreinsProstate-Specific AntigenAgedAged, 80 and overEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLife ExpectancyMaleMammographyPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific Antigencancerlife expectancyscreening

Identifiers

PMID27364834
PMCPMC5071287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.