ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016
Incidental findings discovered during imaging: implications for general practice.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Yield of Neck Mass Imaging: Impact of Clinician Specialty.The Permanente journal · 2025Article
- VOMIT and "BOMIT".The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2025Article
- Incidental findings are frequent in shoulder CT and MRI scans and increase with age.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- [Geriatric ultrasound : Prospective evaluation of ultrasound as extended screening in acute geriatric patients].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2023Article
- Incidental Findings in Pediatric Patients: How to Manage Liver Incidentaloma in Pediatric Patients.Cancers · 2023Review
- Article
- The impact of reporting magnetic resonance imaging incidental findings in the Canadian alliance for healthy hearts and minds cohort.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Maternal and fetal incidental findings on antenatal magnetic resonance imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2021Article
- Unintended consequences: quantifying the benefits, iatrogenic harms and downstream cascade costs of musculoskeletal MRI in UK primary care.BMJ open quality · 2021Article
- Negotiating the risks of computed tomography in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020Review
- Article
- Direct access CT for suspicion of brain tumour: an analysis of referral pathways in a population-based patient group.BMC family practice · 2019Article
- The value of surveying the kidneys during pelvic ultrasound examinations.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2019Article
- Primary care management of headaches and how direct-access MRI fits: a qualitative study of UK general practitioners' views.BMJ open · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.