Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27364051›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2016

Ectopic and Visceral Fat Deposition in Lean and Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Eylem Levelt, Michael Pavlides, Rajarshi Banerjee, Masliza Mahmod, Catherine Kelly, Joanna Sellwood, Rina Ariga, Sheena Thomas, Jane Francis, Christopher Rodgers and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Type 2 diabetes mellitus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eylem LeveltUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Michael PavlidesUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom; Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rajarshi BanerjeePerspectum Diagnostics Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom.
Masliza MahmodUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Catherine KellyPerspectum Diagnostics Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom.
Joanna SellwoodUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rina ArigaUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sheena ThomasDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jane FrancisUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christopher RodgersUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom.
William ClarkeUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nikant SabharwalCardiology Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Charalambos AntoniadesDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jurgen SchneiderUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Matthew RobsonUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kieran ClarkeDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Theodoros KaramitsosUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Oliver RiderUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Stefan NeubauerUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom; Perspectum Diagnostics Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: stefan.neubauer@cardiov.ox.ac.uk.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/12/32/29559Wellcome Trust 098436/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity are associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cardiomyopathy, and cardiovascular mortality. Both show stronger links between ectopic and visceral fat deposition, and an increased cardiometabolic risk compared with subcutaneous fat.

objectivesThis study investigated whether lean patients (Ln) with T2D exhibit increased ectopic and visceral fat deposition and whether these are linked to cardiac and hepatic changes.

methodsTwenty-seven obese patients (Ob) with T2D, 15 Ln-T2D, and 12 normal-weight control subjects were studied. Subjects underwent cardiac computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), proton and phosphorus MR spectroscopy, and multiparametric liver MR, including hepatic proton MRS, T1- and T2*-mapping yielding "iron-corrected T1" [cT1].

resultsDiabetes, with or without obesity, was associated with increased myocardial triglyceride content (p = 0.01), increased hepatic triglyceride content (p = 0.04), and impaired myocardial energetics (p = 0.04). Although cardiac structural changes, steatosis, and energetics were similar between the T2D groups, epicardial fat (p = 0.04), hepatic triglyceride (p = 0.01), and insulin resistance (p = 0.03) were higher in Ob-T2D. Epicardial fat, hepatic triglyceride, and insulin resistance correlated negatively with systolic strain and diastolic strain rates, which were only significantly impaired in Ob-T2D (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). Fibroinflammatory liver disease (elevated cT1) was only evident in Ob-T2D patients. cT1 correlated with hepatic and epicardial fat (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively).

conclusionsIrrespective of body mass index, diabetes is related to significant abnormalities in cardiac structure, energetics, and cardiac and hepatic steatosis. Obese patients with T2D show a greater propensity for ectopic and visceral fat deposition.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Fatty LiverFemaleHumansInsulin ResistanceIntra-Abdominal FatLiverMaleMiddle AgedObesityPericardiumThinnessdiabetic cardiomyopathyepicardial fat depositionfatty liver diseasemagnetic resonance imagingmagnetic resonance spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID27364051
PMCPMC4925621
OpenAlexW2466151179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.