Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27363727›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2016

Site-specific recombinatorics: in situ cellular barcoding with the Cre Lox system.

Tom S Weber, Mark Dukes, Denise C Miles, Stefan P Glaser, Shalin H Naik, Ken R Duffy

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Deciphering precursor cell dynamics in esophageal preneoplasia via genetic barcoding and single-cell transcriptomics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tom S WeberHamilton Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
Mark DukesUniversity of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Denise C MilesThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research & The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
Stefan P GlaserThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research & The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
Shalin H NaikThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research & The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
Ken R DuffyHamilton Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland. ken.duffy@nuim.ie.
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AUNational University of Ireland, Maynooth · IEUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCellular barcoding is a recently developed biotechnology tool that enables the familial identification of progeny of individual cells in vivo. In immunology, it has been used to track the burst-sizes of multiple distinct responding T cells over several adaptive immune responses. In the study of hematopoiesis, it revealed fate heterogeneity amongst phenotypically identical multipotent cells. Most existing approaches rely on ex vivo viral transduction of cells with barcodes followed by adoptive transfer into an animal, which works well for some systems, but precludes barcoding cells in their native environment such as those inside solid tissues.

resultsWith a view to overcoming this limitation, we propose a new design for a genetic barcoding construct based on the Cre Lox system that induces randomly created stable barcodes in cells in situ by exploiting inherent sequence distance constraints during site-specific recombination. We identify the cassette whose provably maximal code diversity is several orders of magnitude higher than what is attainable with previously considered Cre Lox barcoding approaches, exceeding the number of lymphocytes or hematopoietic progenitor cells in mice.

conclusionsIts high diversity and in situ applicability, make the proposed Cre Lox based tagging system suitable for whole tissue or even whole animal barcoding. Moreover, it can be built using established technology.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticAnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesGenetic EngineeringGenetic VariationIntegrasesInverted Repeat SequencesMiceCre recombinaseIntegrasesCell fate trackingCellular barcodingCombinatorial explosionCre lox systemDNA stochastic programme

Identifiers

PMID27363727
PMCPMC4929723
OpenAlexW2261522514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.