Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27363393›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2017

[Psychometric validation in Spanish of the Brazilian short version of the Primary Care Assessment Tools-users questionnaire for the evaluation of the orientation of health systems towards primary care].

Fernando Vázquez Peña, Erno Harzheim, Sergio Terrasa, Silvina Berra

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of the first level of care for tuberculosis control in Buenos Aires, Argentina.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fernando Vázquez PeñaServicio de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: fernandoramon.vazquez@hospitalitaliano.org.ar.
Erno HarzheimUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Sergio TerrasaServicio de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina; Departamento de Investigación, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina; Departamento de Salud Pública, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Silvina BerraInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud (INICSA), Escuela de Salud Pública, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo validate the Brazilian short version of the PCAT for adult patients in Spanish.

designAnalysis of secondary data from studies made to validate the extended version of the PCAT questionnaire. LOCATION: City of Córdoba, Argentina. Primary health care.

participantsThe sample consisted of 46% of parents, whose children were enrolled in secondary education in three institutes in the city of Cordoba, and the remaining 54% were adult users of the National University of Cordoba Health Insurance. MAIN MEASURES: Pearson's correlation coefficient comparing the extended and short versions. Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis, composite reliability, average variance extracted, and Cronbach's alpha values, in order to assess the construct validity and the reliability of the short version.

resultsThe values of Pearson's correlation coefficient between this short version and the long version were high .818 (P<.001), implying a very good criterion validity. The indicators of good global adjustment to the confirmatory factor analysis were good. The value of composite reliability was good (.802), but under the variance media extracted: .3306, since 3 variables had weak factorials loads. The Cronbach's alpha was acceptable (.85).

conclusionsThe short version of the PCAT-users developed in Brazil showed an acceptable psychometric performance in Spanish as a quick assessment tool, in a comparative study with the extended version.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionQuality Assurance, Health CareSelf ReportHumansLanguagePrimary Health CarePsychometricsAtención primariaCalidadCuestionarioPrimary careQualityQuestionnaireValidaciónValidation

Identifiers

PMID27363393
PMCPMC6875994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.