Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27363014›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center.

Lin-Yong Zhao, Chang-Chun Li, Lu-Yu Jia, Xiao-Long Chen, Wei-Han Zhang, Xin-Zu Chen, Kun Yang, Kai Liu, Yi-Gao Wang, Lian Xue and 5 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lin-Yong ZhaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chang-Chun LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Lu-Yu JiaWest China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiao-Long ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Wei-Han ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xin-Zu ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Kun YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Kai LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yi-Gao WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Lian XueDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Bo ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zhi-Xin ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jia-Ping ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zong-Guang ZhouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jian-Kun HuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of node ratio (Nr), the ratio of metastatic to retrieved lymph nodes, and to investigate whether a modified staging system based on Nr can improve prognostic ability for gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy. A total of 2572 patients were randomly divided into training set and validation set, and the cutoff points for Nr were produced using X-tile. The relationships between Nr and other clinicopathologic factors were analyzed, while survival prognostic discriminatory ability and accuracy were compared among different staging systems by AIC and C-index in R program. Patients were categorized into four groups as follows: Nr0, Nr1: 0.00-0.15, Nr2: 0.15-0.40 and Nr3: > 0.40. Nr was significantly associated with clinicopathologic factors including macroscopic type, tumor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor size, T stage, N stage and TNM stage. Besides, for all patients, Nr and TNrM staging system showed a smaller AIC and a larger C-index than that of N and TNM staging system, respectively. Moreover, in subgroup analysis for patients with retrieved lymph nodes < 15, Nr was demonstrated to have a smaller AIC and a larger C-index than N staging system. Furthermore, in validation analysis, Nr, categorized by our cutoff points, showed a larger C-index and a smaller AIC value than those produced in previous studies. Nr could be considered as a reliable prognostic factor, even in patients with insufficient (< 15) retrieved lymph nodes, and TNrM staging system may improve the prognostic discriminatory ability and accuracy for gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastrectomy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGastrectomyHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsSurvival Analysisgastric cancerlymph node ratiopredictionstaging

Identifiers

PMID27363014
PMCPMC5239459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.