ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
Detecting Pairwise Interactive Effects of Continuous Random Variables for Biomarker Identification with Small Sample Size.
Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Aberrant changes to interactions among cellular components have been conjectured to be potential causes of abnormalities in cellular functions. By systematic analysis of high-throughput-omics data, researchers hope to detect potential associations among measured variables for better biomarker identification and phenotype prediction. In this paper, we focus on the methods to measure pairwise interactive effects among continuous random variables, representing molecular expressions, with respect to a given categorical outcome. Together with a comprehensive review on the existing measures, we further propose new measures that better estimate interactive effects, especially in small sample size scenarios. We first evaluate the performance of the existing and new methods for both small and large sample sizes based on simulated datasets that shows our proposed methods outperform previous methods in general. The best performing method for small sample size scenarios suggested by simulation experiments is then implemented to estimate interactive effects among genes with respect to the metastasis outcome in two breast cancer studies based on micro-array gene expression datasets. Our results further demonstrate that integrating detected interactive effects together with individual effects can help in finding more accurate biomarkers for breast cancer metastasis, which are indeed involved in important pathways related to cancer metastasis based on gene set enrichment analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.