Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27362967›Full record

SynthesisCognitive neuropsychology

The neural network for tool-related cognition: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of 70 neuroimaging contrasts.

Ryo Ishibashi, Gorana Pobric, Satoru Saito, Matthew A Lambon Ralph

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cognitive neuropsychology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multimodal semantic knowledge of emotion concepts in frontotemporal dementia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Action-type mapping principles extend beyond evolutionarily conserved actions, even in people born without hands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Human Neuroimaging Reveals Differences in Activation and Connectivity between Real and Pantomimed Tool Use.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hand-Selective Visual Regions Represent How to Grasp 3D Tools: Brain Decoding during Real Actions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryo Ishibashia Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit, School of Psychological Sciences , University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.
Gorana Pobrica Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit, School of Psychological Sciences , University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.
Satoru Saitoa Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit, School of Psychological Sciences , University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.
Matthew A Lambon Ralpha Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit, School of Psychological Sciences , University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J004146/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to recognize and use a variety of tools is an intriguing human cognitive function. Multiple neuroimaging studies have investigated neural activations with various types of tool-related tasks. In the present paper, we reviewed tool-related neural activations reported in 70 contrasts from 56 neuroimaging studies and performed a series of activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analyses to identify tool-related cortical circuits dedicated either to general tool knowledge or to task-specific processes. The results indicate the following: (a) Common, task-general processing regions for tools are located in the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL) and ventral premotor cortex; and (b) task-specific regions are located in superior parietal lobule (SPL) and dorsal premotor area for imagining/executing actions with tools and in bilateral occipito-temporal cortex for recognizing/naming tools. The roles of these regions in task-general and task-specific activities are discussed with reference to evidence from neuropsychology, experimental psychology and other neuroimaging studies.

Indexed as

SemanticsBrain MappingCerebral CortexHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotor ActivityNerve Netactionmeta-analysissemantic representationTooltool-use

Identifiers

PMID27362967
PMCPMC4989859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.